This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I was disagreeing, but could understand where you were coming from until "pretty quickly". Do you think Epstein was caught pretty quickly?
Epstein was hiding in the open. His crimes were well publicized for a very long time. The reports were out there. I don’t think his recent stuff was any new information. It was just old information that got treated differently.
In some ways a lot like Hunter Biden. People have seen his laptop for years and business partners had flipped.
Epstein was a rich guy with famous friends and little public profile before he was arrested, and even then it was a minor news story until the allegations resurfaced. He's not a famous guy who molested girls, he's a guy who's famous because he molested girls.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
What are you talking about? The police knew about his prostitution Ponzi scheme and had the case buried by either the state prosecutor or the feds (can't remember which).
It took quite awhile for false flags we happen to know about to come to light.
The attack on the USS Liberty, by all appearances, was a false flag, but saying so is the domain of conspiracy theorists.
Wait, a false flag by whom?
It looks pretty straightforward Israel-on-US to me.
It does now, the false flag would be Israel trying to make the US believe that an adversary of Israel sank the boat.
Oh.
But they did it with aircraft that only they operated. And flagged Israeli speedboats.
I understand the potential motivation to get us bombing Egypt, but this doesn’t seem like a very good way to go about it.
If your plan is to allow for no survivors, it makes no sense to create more evidence of your false flag operation.
I think it’s likely that the attack was planned by an underling and scuttled by a superior who had no prior knowledge, and that explains why survivors were allowed to live.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
The police did not fuck it up, they were told to stand down by a higher authority.
Also, lots of people knew that it happened, they were being called conspiracy theorists for years before the truth finally came out.
It requires people to know that an event took place, but it requires next to no one to know it was a false flag.
A false flag doesn't have to be a large conspiracy, and there's no evidence such an event would come under scrutiny by anyone who's not a conspiracy theorist.
If the police were protecting Epstein initially, whatever motive they had for protecting him evaporated after the Miami Herald ran a story years later about what a sweetheart deal he got. Prosecutors went out on a limb to convict him again and track down his missing accomplice. And the story wasn't even that big until after the indictment. If there were some huge baked-in motive for protecting Epstein, it would have been really easy for the New York prosecutor to simply say that he felt double jeopardy precluded him from prosecuting. Epstein wasn't exactly a household name before his most recent legal troubles.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link