site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of July 17, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

His cousin joined CMRI a few years ago

The sedevacantist group with ties to the mafia?

He attended an SSPX for the Latin mass and was shocked to see half the congregation openly carrying firearms

That would be very SSPX-like, yes, but it’s surprising that 1) a sedevacantist, particularly from out-there hardliners like the CMRI, would go there and 2) any regular Latin mass goer would find lots of open carry shocking.

The sedevacantist group with ties to the mafia?

It's all Greek... er I mean Latin to me.

Yes, sedevacantist. He did go in to that, but not mafia, gonna have to look in to that one.

  1. a sedevacantist, particularly from out-there hardliners like the CMRI, would go there and 2) any regular Latin mass goer would find lots of open carry shocking.

And based on my culture waring these surprised me as well. I figured he'd hate a group like SPXX with almost more passion than the Holy See. Also I ribbed him about being surprised at open carry because his church is in an area of the country nationally famous for open carry. He said only like three guys in his congregation open carry. He's fresh moved there and is a Cali boy so I'm thinking he's still learning the ropes.

Usually the SSPX and sedevacantists get along worse than the SSPX and the Vatican, or sedevacantists and each other, but it might just be an individual thing.

He did go in to that, but not mafia, gonna have to look in to that one

The founder’s investigation for sex abuse got derailed when he was arrested for arms trafficking. His replacement was ordained by a bishop who was literally a mob boss in Galveston. At least that’s the TLDR I remember. The details could be different, I think there might be a schism in there somewhere.