site banner
George_E_Hale  insufferable blowhard  1yr ago (aerosociety.com)   1369 thread views

AI and the military: Highlights from the RAeS Future Combat Air & Space Capabilities Summit

aerosociety.com

AI post. Never made a top-level post before, plz let me know what I'm doing wrong.

Quote from part of the article:

one simulated test saw an AI-enabled drone tasked with a SEAD mission to identify and destroy SAM sites, with the final go/no go given by the human. However, having been ‘reinforced’ in training that destruction of the SAM was the preferred option, the AI then decided that ‘no-go’ decisions from the human were interfering with its higher mission – killing SAMs – and then attacked the operator in the simulation.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This 'simulation' is basically a thought experiment. And frankly the whole story didn't make sense anyway.

Ah yes, the bit that got Lt. Col. Tucker “Cinco” Hamilton into trouble, because the way he told it made it sound like "it really happened, guys!" and then he had to later clarify that this was only a thought-experiment. Or something. Maybe it was just him and a bunch of the guys blueskying about this kind of thing over a few cans of Bud Light?:

But in a statement to Insider, the US air force spokesperson Ann Stefanek denied any such simulation had taken place.

“The Department of the Air Force has not conducted any such AI-drone simulations and remains committed to ethical and responsible use of AI technology,” Stefanek said. “It appears the colonel’s comments were taken out of context and were meant to be anecdotal.”

I think I'm not going to be checking outside my windows for murderbot AI drones quite yet 😁

Very interesting, thanks. Will keep this up to give your rebuttal visibility.

why would the drone/AI know the specific location of the operator or the "communication tower" t

Given how much EW is going on, you'd want to use directional transmission, no ? So locations of transmitters that whose orders it's supposed to check would be something an autonomous drone would keep track of, I believe.

I read that story and something smelled fishy, mostly because it seemed too familiar, down to some of the specific details. I don't remember where I heard/read it on the internet before, but I must have.

It's the basic story from AI stop button/corrigibility in the video by Robert Miles, the hero of midwitted doomers.

I mean, you'd want it to know where its infrastructure is so you can train it to protect that infrastructure. That does make some sense.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats