This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I don't choose to toe the woke line. In fact, I don't toe the woke line; I'm at a company now where I can ignore the woke stuff and neither contradict nor acquiese to it. But my personal situation is irrelevant to the point. The Supreme Court can rule against discrimination against whites and Asians. The colleges will ignore the ruling. The administrative agencies will ignore the ruling. The lower courts will ignore the ruling. And none of them will see any problem with that, nor will the population at large.
Again, we've been over this, you might not like it but yes you do. After all, all you're doing in this post right here right now is mindlessly parroting progressive propaganda like a good little stooge.
After you get out of jail, I would like to see an Inferential Distance episode where you finally explain your strange predilection to insist that people believe things they vociferously repudiate and belong to groups they consistently and vocally loathe. Surely you do not hope for this to result in a productive discussion, nor are you so naive as to expect them to agree if you accuse them enough times.
And sure, bad faith exists. But if bad faith opponents are so persistent, it looks quite futile to me to do… this.
More options
Context Copy link
5-day ban
Have you guys decided to tighten the screws or something? A minor spat between regulars doesn’t require the banhammer imo.
Hylynka has been in the queue too much lately. Some of the other stuff would be difficult to explain why it's bad. This one was straightforward enough.
And I am currently as strict as I always am. Amadan is the nice one. If amadan leaves the queue clear for too long then I start to notice. If I start to notice I put on my mod cap until I stop noticing.
Since you banned me for excessive snark towards Hlynka a few days ago, I’d just like to register my disagreement towards your severity here, hopefully cleared from accusations of self-serving bias.
Some ribbing between regulars who know each other well is not damaging to discourse the way the same barbs on or by strangers would be. The artificial politeness and stringent rules of civility we maintain towards strangers is just a utilitarian phase, not an end in itself. Deep down we disagree fundamentally, but at first we pretend not to, just to get the exchange going. Later on this allows us to honestly confront each other’s beliefs. So if Hlynka believes what he says and has established rapport, he should be free to express himself without repercussions, not dance around his true beliefs. That’s what I believe anyway. But perhaps nybbler, or Hlynka, prefers his opponent’s opinion sugar-coated ad infinitam, in which case fine, have at it.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Noticing what they do is not "parroting progressive propaganda". I'm not sure what accusing everyone who opposes them as being them and ultimately suggesting a retreat into mysticism is, but it isn't going to help either.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link