This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Well, there are numerous ways you could respond.
You could decide that if he doesn't want to engage and you find engagement not worth it, to not engage.
Or you could say "I think dismissing my post because you don't like that I used a word is unreasonable."
Or you could say "I think pogrom is entirely appropriate in this context: here's why."
Lots of ways, really.
But not with snarky comments like "feeding my comments through chatgpt so it can properly neolib the vernacular to not trigger you."
Come on, you're too smart to play stupid; when you uncork, you know you're uncorking, and either you know you're going to get modded or you're just hoping it won't get noticed. I do not believe for one hot second that you really thought any mod here, reading the report on that one, would say "Yeah, that's fine."
I was not joking, and i seriously am contemplating using chatgpt, because a lot of these are coming out of nowhere at me. At some point the overton window or the vernacular allowed here shifted out from under me. You think I "uncorked" but that was me trying to problem solve. You only further proved to me I now need an AI sensitivity reader to post here.
You do what you think you have to do, my man, but bluntly: I do not believe you. This had nothing to do with allowable vernacular or overton windows (the person you were arguing with objected to "pogrom" - I did not, and that's not why you got modded) and "I need to run my words throught ChatGPT so I don't trigger you" was not a sincere attempt at "problem-solving," it was you expressing your contempt.
I have contempt for many problems I am forced to solve that shouldn't be problems in the first place. Problems and contempt go hand in hand.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
When people are overly sensitive in reacting to your posts, why grow sensitive yourself? Just shrug it off.
A) I'd love to if I wasn't now eating bans for it and
B) I'm not growing more sensitive. I find the overly sensitive values here repugnant to me, and to avoid having to meaningfully interface with them, I'm going to use an AI. Seems the perfect tool to resist the inherent weakness of this place bleeding back into my world view.
Pretty sure you got that ban not for your initial choice of words but for what the mod called "belligerence" in a follow-up comment. And eh, let's not get stuck on terminology but here's the facts as I see them - that follow-up had nothing to do with the actual subject but was entirely you engaging with a @Gdanning's objection to your choice of words. Which leads to...
...this? That seems needlessly theatrical. If you think the complaints about your initial comment aren't warranted, then why go through the effort of changing your style? It's not like that's what got you modded.
I don't mean to offend, but come on. If you don't want people to overreact, then don't overreact.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link