site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   6177 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for March 12, 2023

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

6
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I guess I meant how many new members since the initial influx. I think we were at 2,000 last time someone asked?

We were, although that was long past the initial influx. Looks like we're at 2259 now, although I don't know how many of those are attempts at spambots and so forth.

How often do new members go on to be productive posters? Do you know (including older people) roughly how many people regularly post or vote on things?

I admit I haven't attempted to quantify that. It's an interesting question, and I'd like an answer except I do not have time to do the work required to create an appropriate database query >_<

The following will get you, segmented by month,

  • Number of signups in that month

  • Number of those signups who have ever commented

  • Average number of comments by those signups (total and per day)

  • Average number of comment words written by those signups (total and per day)

  • Average number of upvotes on comments by those signups (total and per day)

  • Average number of downvotes on comments by those signups (total and per day)

  • Average score (up - down) on comments by those signups (total and per day)


with user_comment_stats as (

    select

        u.id as user_id,

        min(to_timestamp(u.created_utc)::date) as signup_date,

        count(c.id) as n_comments,

        sum(array_length(regexp_split_to_array(trim(c.body), E'\\W+'), 1)) as total_words_written,

        sum(c.upvotes) as total_upvotes,

        sum(c.downvotes) as total_downvotes,

        sum(c.upvotes - c.downvotes) as total_score,

        min(now()::date - to_timestamp(u.created_utc)::date) as days_since_signup

    from users u

        left join comments c on c.author_id = u.id

    group by user_id

)
select

    left(signup_date::text, 7) as signup_month,

    count(distinct user_id) as n_users,

    sum((n_comments > 0)::int) as n_commented,

    avg(n_comments) as avg_comments_per_user,

    avg(total_words_written) as avg_commentwords_per_user,

    avg(total_upvotes) as avg_upvotes_per_user,

    avg(total_downvotes) as avg_downvotes_per_user,

    avg(total_score) as avg_score_per_user,

    avg(n_comments / days_since_signup) as avg_daily_comments_per_user,

    avg(total_words_written / days_since_signup) as avg_daily_commentwords_per_user,

    avg(total_upvotes / days_since_signup) as avg_daily_upvotes_per_user,

    avg(total_downvotes / days_since_signup) as avg_daily_downvotes_per_user,

    avg(total_score / days_since_signup) as avg_daily_score_per_user

from user_comment_stats

group by signup_month

You can do a similar thing with votes and posts if you care about such things.

Though honestly there are fewer than 2500 users and 100000 comments on the motte -- fancy analytics approaches are unlikely to tell you anything you don't already know from regularly reading the motte.

Sheesh, you're better at that than I am :V

So the tl;dr is that unsurprisingly the vast bulk of posting users (about 1000) signed up on the first two months. I'm not sure how meaningful this is, of course, because the site was new and obviously most people would sign up then, and we probably had a good number of people who saw comments about it, signed up, made a comment, and never came back. It looks like we're picking up consistently somewhere around 50 users per month since then.

Ignoring the first-month users, "average daily comments per user" is extremely chaotic but hangs out in general around 0.01 - 0.08, and yes, that range covers almost an entire order of magnitude.

This does make me think I need to return to focusing on getting new users (which has unfortunately gotten harder, I was thinking about setting up a Twitter bot to post quality contributions and obviously that ain't happening).

I'd mentioned elsewhere that advertising on suitable communities or with suitable disclaimers on reddit might be a good idea, what with the current goings-on, so you could do that. Presumably after the blackout but before the end of the month would be best.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats