This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
2Cimafara being not an actual conscious human being, but a literal NPC who simply manipulates and regurgitates the symbols presented to her in a semi randomized manner would certainly explain a great deal about our past interactions over the years, but I don't think that's all we are.
I wonder if the reason that you and ilforte seem to have such difficulty with GPT is that you're so wrapped up in your post modernist millue that you don't realize that the concept of truth is a perquisite to lying. After all what does it mean for a word (or answer) to be made up when all words are made up.
do mimicking animals have a concept of truth?
also, 'perquisite' means perk/privilege, you mean prerequisite
I would say "no"
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Your long-held grudges are petty and increasingly personal. Stop it.
I said I don't think that is all we are.
Yes, you said that preceded by "It would explain a lot if my long-time bête noire was ".
If you thought "if" was enough of a qualifier to ameliorate the obvious potshots, it was not.
Again I specifically said that I don't think that is all we are.
Tell me, which is more in spirit with "speak like you want everyone to be included" and "engaging with those you disagree with"? cimafara's casual dismissal of anyone who disagrees with her as a mindless "midwit", who is not even conscious. Or my pushing back against the same?
When I saw read that comment, I asked myself 'is that the nickname of a public figure I don't recognize?' and not 'is that the screen-name of a Mottean I don't see on this thread?'
I think Amdan's point was that the comment is "bringing up" more than "pushing back", but what I want to add is that even with the mod message, the comment still totally reads as "a mild an entirely appropriate joke about 2Cimafara, which is the name of a Podcase or maybe one of the people who was British Prime Minister last year."
You might not consider that effective as mockery. I consider this something I need to post now so I can see it next time I'm scrolling through my comment history thinking, 'wasn't there a podcast I wanted to check out?' I have a clear reminder to stop.
I absolutely understand if someone wants to mock me for that, but I'll waste 30 minutes next time Blocked and Reported drops looking otherwise.
More options
Context Copy link
I do not read her as saying "anyone who disagrees with her is a mindless midwit," but maybe I am a 115 IQ midwit. You seem to have taken offense because she believes we're all just very advanced chatbots and not creatures with souls made in the image of God. You can take offense at that, but she's not breaking any rules by expressing her view, and you are by very specifically and deliberately insulting her.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I think this is a level of what we are. A few weeks back I had a weird, slow-roll cold that gave me some intermittent spots of extreme brain fog. While I was at work. Helping customers. There were a few points where I just declined the option to beg off and go home, and instead called "Lizardbrain take the wheel!" and just went through entire conversations on autopilot and muscle memory and what felt like the neural equivalent of muscle memory. It was a bit sobering to realize how much of what I do can be handled by non-conscious processes. I suspect there are people who are basically in that state all the time.
On some level it is what we are, as Musashi would would argue, true mastery of a skill is when you can execute it without thinking. But I would just as readily argue that it is not all we are. I feel like there is a specific mistake being made here where "ability to string words together" is being mistaken for "ability to answer a question" because in part the post modernist does not recognize a difference. If you hold that all meaning is arbitrary the content of the answer is irrelevant but if you don't...
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link