site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   3303 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for February 3, 2023

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

5
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What are your favorite articles/videos on game strategy? I'm thinking of things along the lines of Who's the Beatdown? for the Magic the Gathering card game. Not looking for any particular game, just interesting strategy articles.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=QHHg99hwQGY

https://youtube.com/watch?v=8uE6-vIi1rQ

It's not really strategy, but I think the general realm of game design is pretty similar, since obviously good designers are considering possible strategies. The first link is twenty lessons a Magic game designer learnt. The second video is about "cursed" problems in game design, where cursed problems are where your game design goal has a fundamental contradiction and is basically impossible to make fun.

Related to MtG, I always recommended that article as well as Ben Stark's drafting the hard way to new players on Arena.

I also like level one, but that's not an article.

I love aggro in magic so who's the beat down was one of my favorites. And surprisingly I was the beat down less than I would have guessed.

Absorbing that lesson really improved my play but most of my favorite wins came when my opponent thought they were the beat down only to learn they were not about midway through turn 4.

For MTG, clearly 36 bears. There are some other cool explanations on that site, but none so readily capture the essence of competitive gaming.

David Sirlin's Playing to Win is a classic book on strategy as pertains to fighting games. It generalizes pretty well even for games that aren't designed with the same principles. Some parts of it are also more about the culture of winning, especially in contrast to a culture of improving.

This blog has a bunch of articles on the design of roleplaying games. The top series is not strictly about strategy, but about decomposing the interactions between players, game conceit, and in-fiction logic. I thought it had pretty interesting implications about translating player intent.

I've got a lot of disagreements (and don't particularly like the fighting game genre), but Sirlin's writing are generally pretty strong. Not all are about strategy, but even things more focused on game design still drop ideas like donkeyspace.

The Game Design Forum is even more about game design, but it's overwhelming through a logistics and strategy lens. I don't think every player encounters the game like the author expects them to (aka the Elixir problem), but it's interesting to see from the inside.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats