This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
But don't you know the slippery slope is a fallacy? Just because we've won a victory on X does not mean at all that we'll be moving on to Y!
When you've seen it happen once, twice, three times, all the times, That Thing That Never Happens Just Happened Again, you stop paying attention to your betters telling you that this is a logical fallacy, see, we have an entire selection of rebuttals to it and instead you learn to trust your lying eyes.
I don't think there's a conspiracy or an agenda as such, at least not more than usual. It's just that this is where liberalism is at right now, and these are the acceptable thoughts to think. If A is a bad thing, or banning A is a bad thing, then we must work to make sure A is stopped/A is not stopped. If we all agree that being gay is fine, then we want to educate the people and places that think being gay is bad. If we all agree that same-sex marriage is a human right, then we want human rights to be universal.
If trans people just want to use bathrooms.... and there you go. No need for sinister moustache-twirling baddies plotting to put hormones in the water supply of every kindergarten, just 'this is what right-thinking nice people agree is okay'.
What I find so troubling about this is I don't think the people pushing this thing even consider that there could be features unique to each step of this journey that they wish to take us down. It's all flattened to this Marxist type oppressed VS oppressor narrative. There are meaningful differences between the push for decriminalization mutually consensual sexual acts between same sex pairings, the push for same sex marriage and the push to trans acceptance and the territory beyond is full of new exotic frontiers chock full of terrors. These people take all advancement as progress whether pointed at a cliff or a bridge. And the kind of thing you can push into the oppressed VS oppressor box is troublingly diverse. There is a reason conservatives find pedophilia and zoophilia so easy to reach to. I don't really see a limiting principle that would prevent these from being the new frontier and you would hardly even need to update the slide decks.
Because we've reached the point where the norm as such, not just concrete legal discrimination, is oppressive and needs to be "queered".
Unfortunately, we have norms for a reason.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I don’t think WEF is a cabal setting the agenda. I think modern “elites” are very much worried about staying “elite” and therefore mimic what other “elites” do and say. That is, WEF isn’t setting the agenda but it is telling you what the group think is.
More options
Context Copy link
Well, my entire point in favor of conspiracy theories, is that conspiracies are pretty usual.
Man, time flies. I felt better when I could say "it wasn't, a mere 5 years ago". We're closing to 10 now, but it's still not so long ago. Anyway, despite liberalism not being at this point back then, liberalism as it is now managed to push the old liberalism out, and it sure as hell did not happen "bottom up". In fact we've been told the same things about slippery slopes, and uncharitable strawmen, and bad things that will never happen that you brought up.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link