site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   16082 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of December 19, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

16
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

With Europe, part of the problem is linguistic. Until relatively recently in the UK, a phrase like "people of color" would be regarded as racist or at least suspicious. It sounds too much like "coloured people", which is obviously a demonic and corrupting word. I remember a poster in my high school geography class that poked fun at the very idea that a black person was "coloured", given that white skin varies more in pigmentation with sickness, embarassment etc.

In Continental Europe, there is even more work to be done. Terms like "race" largely fell out of use and a lot of racial statistics are not even tracked. Since around the 1940s, countries like France and Germany have tended towards the colourblind model of anti-racism: "Whatever the colour of your skin, what matters is that you speak French and have French values of secularism, mutual support, smoking like a chimney, eating chocolate cake for breakfast" etc. To fit with the predominat American woke culture, the European left will have to overcome this colourblindedness and create a situation where e.g. Thierry Henry is a Caribbean-Frenchman, not just a Frenchman, so he can be adequately saved from his oppression.

Thanks, this is a useful set of insights. It's been a few years since I lived in Germany, but I already saw the direction of travel.

I can assure that, being a bit in the insides, the first institution that is building DEI is the EU. National Institutions are still very well behind, but the EU is, starting from the de facto uber-feminist approach that they always had, trying to spin things in that direction.

For example, last year there was a cry from France and other countries that the EU internal comms suggested that we shoudl use Happy Holidays instead of Merry Christmas to not be offensive. The internal communication was deleted and excuses were done, we were happy that sometimes there was a victory etc

Fast forward this year, and without any sort of communication, 70% of the departments switched to Happy Holidays. No order from above, no comm, no conspiracy, simple because the people doing the comms are female and left-wing.

As you see, no victory.

I also see it mostly like this, but I think

National Institutions are still very well behind

requires some additional qualification.

Speaking for Germany, of course, and not bothering to look up sources - ignore me at your leisure - there are many national institutions that are by all means keeping pace with the EU, if not even pulling ahead on some points. Fashionable cities like Berlin, many elements of the federal government especially since the last election, state governments under leftist control, taxpayer-funded nominal NGOs, all of education from Kindergarten up to Universities, and of course our dear public media complex. It's patchy, many are indeed very well behind as you say, but I wouldn't want to deny the great and often successful efforts of many entities below the level of the EU.

And I think you've hit the nail on the head with your observation that there are no permanent victories as long as the enemy keeps pushing.

Until relatively recently in the UK, a phrase like "people of color" would be regarded as racist or at least suspicious.

It still strikes me that way in the US. It's really funny to me how the left has reinvented "colored people". The paper-thin sophistry they use to justify it doesn't really make it any better, either.

the European left will have to overcome this colourblindedness

There are some older hold-outs, but this has long happened. Our kids are buying your blue jeans and listening to your pop music.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats