site banner
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I’m sure they do.

How many of the Germans would you say were there involuntarily? Hitler, at least, was quite enthusiastic in his enlistment.

Its not Germans, its all conscripts across all nations.

Their were mutinies in the French, British, and German armies including the german navy... I think that's a pretty dramatic statement that they didn't want to be there

In addition to the fact the conscription was neccessary to begin with. There wasn't an all volunteer army on any side of WW1

There wasn't an all volunteer army on any side of WW1

Notably, this is not true for the Australian Imperial Force, which was entirely volunteer - the split over conscription (a referendum which narrowly failed) ended up splitting the Australian Labor Party and ultimately shaped the modern Liberal and Labor Parties.

Then the goalposts are receding faster than the Maginot line twenty years later.

I think claiming German suffering in WWI was a Holocaust 1.0 is in poor taste. Going further to suggest

“Was Hitler’s crime simply doing what the civilized nations of the world… the French Republic, the British Empire, the German Nation… had done to him when he was young?”

That’s rather bold apologetics, and it’s also laughably inaccurate. Hitler, at least, was a red-blooded volunteer, and conflating him with downtrodden conscripts is buying into the laziest of Weimar-era Nazi propaganda.

I never claimed Germany suffered a holocaust.

Boys suffered a holocaust.

Boys 14-25 are the most discriminated against group in human history. Full stop.

No group has suffered such violence so Deeply in the moment, vastly across nations, and consistently across time.

The bloodiest day of the holocaust it was calculated 15,000 people were killed.

Bloodiest day of WW1 20,000 British! boys were killed (not counting all the other powers)

.

And notably this is a holocaust that never ended

The world screamed never again after the holocaust... but even our "humane" "modern" "progressive" welfare states reserve the right to drag teenagers from their home and massacre them by the million.

Indeed both Ukraine and Russia are doing this now without a fucking mummer of protest

Actually if you cut out the mra-djacent whining about the sin of conscription I think it actually cashes out as a fourth grade essay question level of analysis of Hitler:

Hitler was really bad because he treated people who weren't soldiers like soldiers. Everyone knows it's ok to kill soldiers in a war, but you can't kill people who aren't soldiers.

I'll also point out that, per prior comparisons to slavery and the Holocaust, 8-14% of WWI soldiers died in the war. 80% of Auschwitz inmates died there. American Black slaves died in slavery better than 80% of the time.

So if you took the question at the time of conscription, the vast majority of young men would choose the trenches. I doubt the option of "take up anti conscription terrorism" has better odds, outside the Vietnam era.

Sure, if you ask them as they go over the top at the Somme you might get more takers, but that's just letting people cash out their bet mid game. At the time of conscription, materially, getting drafted is a better pick.