What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Shadowrun, unlike CP2020, got more than one videogame adaptation. There's one on SNES, one on Sega, a Kickstarter-era trilogy and probably some terrible FPS that I have erased from my memory.
Not exclusive! It was on PC as well, and one of the features they touted was that you could play with Xbox players on PC, and vice versa. Which to be fair was pretty unique at the time. I heard the game wasn't at all good though.
I have a couple friends who enjoyed it. The way you could build out gear/cyberwear/magic let you have really customizable builds and loadouts for an FPS. Kind of a waste of the IP though.
More options
Context Copy link
Ironically enough, I think Shadowrun could stand to have an open-world first-person adaptation not unlike CP2077. Question, though, is who on Earth would take that undertaking?
CDProjekt Red?
Well, besides the big developer/publisher that already has a competing tabletop franchise they've invested in...Paradox, maybe? Except Paradox also basically owns WOD (though they also published the HBS BattleTech game). I doubt Microsoft would do it (unless they're that hard up for stuff to put under the Xbox brand).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link