This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Yep. That's why the only winning move is to not play, IMO. Willpower is a finite resource, while entire industries of highly-paid optimizers are working full-time to break it with their products. Limiting your vectors of exposure is the best way to live a life free of negative drains, but this is becoming increasingly difficult as more and more things become gamified services. This involves more than just Gacha, but that industry is where it's really easy to see the psychological tricks laid bare.
This is the solution I'm adopting, to be sure. There's a huge 'Camels Nose in the Tent' element, however.
This really slammed home for me approximately 1 year ago when I went and played Blackjack at a casino for the first time.
I was 'smart' in that I placed a hard limit on the amount of money I was willing to bet, total, and when I won that amount I immediately 'banked' it so I couldn't actually lose money anymore. Of course, they have ATMs INSIDE the Casino so you don't have to be limited to merely the cash on hand.
At one point I was up, I think, by like $5,000. I ended the session up by about $400.
And for weeks afterwards I couldn't completely shake the desire to go back and keep playing. Thankfully it would have been a couple hours drive and so it wasn't something I could just easily do on a whim.
But holy cow just a couple hours of play gave me such a rush that I was still thinking about it weeks after the fact. Something I had never actually done for the vast majority of my life. I don't even think losing my virginity had that kind of mental staying power.
Yeah, we live in a world where everything is attempting to exploit your psychology and the proliferation of convenient ways to spend money means there's virtually no friction to slow your descent into any particular hole of addiction.
I could wax/rant on the topic of how easy it is to put money INTO various systems but the said systems are very reluctant to send money back, but on the topic of gambling in particular I think we're going down a very, very dangerous path if we don't erect more serious barriers to entry. I don't know how to achieve that, however.
The phenomenon you're describing is basically just Beginner's Luck. As ridiculous as it sounds, Beginners Luck is real. Think about it—say you've never gambled before but go to the casino when one of your friends suggests it would make a fun night out. And say you spend the entire evening slowly losing $400. You're probably going to think that gambling is the stupidest thing on earth and the next time your friends want to hang out you'll probably suggest going bowling instead. This isn't to say you're never going to gamble again, but since your first experience with it was a hard slap in the face you're probably going to be more circumspect about the whole enterprise. Now suppose on the other hand that your first experience is similar to the one you described. Now gambling seems like an easy, thrilling way to make money. Sure, you eventually lost a ton, but you know what it's like to be up 5 grand and that it's possible, in a non-theoretical way, to earn a month's salary in a matter of hours. Now you've got a dragon to chase.
I think a good first step would be limiting gambling to actual casinos or other physical places. I know that for actual degenerate gamblers this probably won't make much of a difference, but there's something particularly scummy about being able to play slot machines any time, anywhere. The closest casino to me is 20–25 minutes away from my house, and if I wanted to gamble I'd at least have to find time to make the drive down there. It seems fundamentally different than being able to just lie in bed and play slots.
Bingo.
There was a point at which I realized that I was placing bets on individual hands that was larger than the whole amount I had budgeted for playing. And it was fun. Feeling like a relative high roller, fantasizing about winning enough to, well if not quit my job take a really long, fancy vacation. All while knowing on a fundamental level that I'm playing a game where the odds are deliberately stacked against me so that it isn't rational to expect it to happen. On the other hand, there's probably a few versions of me in different timeline branches who got extremely lucky and were quite happy with the outcome.
I should also point out that I took a brief break between sessions, and when I came back to the table, that's when I lost most of my position, just a string of "bad luck" that contrasted strongly to the winning streak I had been on. So yeah, 'beginners luck' would be the right way to categorize that. And everything about the process is designed to make you feel like you're special and the winning will never end.
I agree... but this sounds impossible to enforce without levels of draconian control of the internet that I am far less comfortable with.
The point I've alluded to is how easy/frictionless it is to transfer money into basically any entity these days.
Perhaps a comparable law could be that in order to play any kind of games that get categorized as 'gambling' you have to physically deposit money with the entity running the game. That is, you must withdraw the amount from your account as cash, physically hold it and carry it to a location, and physically hand it over, vs. simply entering an account number or swiping a card.
This would be almost as good as strictly limiting it to physical locations. And then enforcement can take place at the payment processor level, which STILL has concerns over draconian control, but doesn't require direct surveillance of all users.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link