This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
It looks to me like you aren't getting the better end of this debate, and are looking for a way to make this my fault.
If you have an example of me using my mod powers in a debate, I'd certainly like to see it. If you think I'm lacking in morals, it'd be interesting to hear an elaboration of why.
You’ve banned many people who did not deserve it. Of all stripes. Censorship trespasses against your fellow man, and it harms you. I suppose it’s common enough in the new internet, people don’t have the right to express themselves anymore. But I still hold a grudge.
You‘ve even banned what you called a major influence, a friend. Then judas gave a tearful eulogy. It was the most craven, two-faced, pathetic display of regret I ever saw.
If I've banned "many people who didn't deserve it", it should be pretty easy for you to point to examples. There's a search bar at the top of the page, syntax would be "author:FCfromSSC banned", feel free to provide examples.
I presume this is a reference to HlynkaCG? Hlynka himself was quite clear that he understood that he was breaking the rules, and would not stop doing so. Leaving aside that I am not in fact the one who banned him; I certainly think it was the proper action for a mod to take, and would ask what you think we should have done, given a long and increasingly frequent history of him breaking the forum's rules?
Are you under the impression that Hlynka expected to not get banned, or that he resented his ban or considered it unfair or unwarranted?
You have invented a caricature in your own mind that has no relation to reality. I fundamentally believe that this forum is built on unsustainable contradictions. I see my job as a mod to be to try to help keep it running as long as possible. If you think I or the other mods are doing it wrong, we're open to arguments for how we can do it better. Sadly, most of the arguments we receive are based on the sorts of caricatures you're deploying here.
More options
Context Copy link
Dude, speak plainly. What are you on about?
He appears to be referring to HlynkaCG's ban, and to my comments following it. Hlynka is probably my all-time favorite poster in any of the versions of this forum, I argued with and then alongside him for years, I credit him for having by far the largest impact on my own thinking of anyone I've conversed with here. I think he was right about most things, and miss him dearly. I also maintain that he decided that he wasn't willing to follow the rules any more, and so the mod team was presented with the choice of either invalidating the rules or banning him. Banning him was the correct choice. I also would argue that inviting a ban was the correct choice for him; he did not seem to need what this place offers any more, would be the way I would put it, and I can respect that. I've been near to that point a few times myself.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link