This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
What if the shoe fits though?
Then stand by your convictions, admit what you're doing, and argue that it's good.
If your goal is to entice someone to murder Hitler, that saying out loud that he needs shooting is not the most efficient way to go about it, because that kind of speech is quickly shut down. Either you become personally part of a conspiracy to murder him (which might not be practical, or you might not be willing to pay the price) -- in which case you do not make any public statements beforehand, or you try to stay on the right side of the law and depend on your listeners to connect the dots. So you say that Hitler will be the doom of the German people and that he is much more dangerous than Rosa Luxemburg (a communist who was shot in 1918) ever was.
(FWIW, I am rather strictly against murdering Trump. I will not pretend I would not be happy if he died of natural causes (heart failure after ingesting viagra would be lovely) tomorrow, or if he went the way of Joe Biden, but he would be a lot more damaging as a dead martyr than as a living president.)
More options
Context Copy link
Admit to what? Terrorism? That's nuts.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link