This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I think that one aspect of this is that not all jobs are equal in prestige. Presumably, all things being equal, being a dish washer will lead to more success on the dating market than being a garbageman. So the demand-supply equilibrium for the hourly rates of a garbageman are higher than for a dish washer. The invisible hand of the market saves us yet again.
This is not restricted by gender in any way. A classical low prestige occupation (especially at low wage levels) is prostitution. Basically anyone would rather work eight hours as a supermarket cashier than have sex for money for the same period of time. Thus the hourly wages for a sex worker are much higher than for a cashier.
Another non-monetary benefit of a job is potential for advancement. The dish washer can level up to cook. The garbageman can not really expect to advance much from experience, being the one who drives the truck is more a matter of having the right driving license than being an expert in garbage collection operations. I am doubtful that leveling up your sex skill will significantly increase your income from sex work. By contrast, the cashier might plausibly get promoted to assistant manager at some point.
This is the woke thing where an unequal outcome is taken as an indication for foul play. As usual, it is bullshit. Any female cook can decide to make it big as a garbagewoman. Any nurse-in-training can decide that she would prefer to deal with the elderly in a more permanent fashion and become a grave-digger. If they don't, this does not mean that the system is unfair.
Not disagreeing with your general point, but ‘dishwasher’ isn’t really a higher-status job than ‘garbage man’- although it probably has more flexible hours. That seems like a much more relevant difference, but maybe the UK employment market is different.
More options
Context Copy link
Upvoting not just for the very sensible analysis but for "deal with the elderly in a more permanent fashion".
More options
Context Copy link
Driving the truck is determined by experience and seniority in garbage collecting - it's not much easier than being the guy who gets out when necessary, but it is easier. But your point still stands because there's nowhere to go from there - you are either the guy who drives garbage around all day or you are the guy who drives around with garbage all day. You can't collect garbage so well you get promoted to management, not these days.
Does driving the truck not open up possibilities of non-garbage truck driving?
When I was doing IT for the council here it was the other way around - everyone started off in the tip or the depot and was trying to get a job in the trucks. Driving the truck waa the easiest job there, because you never had to do heavy lifting.
I meant my comment as "does driving the garbage truck not open up opportunities for truck driving in general?"
Ah I was thinking of advancement strictly within the same company.
Yeah, my hyphenation was done intentionally, but I was afraid it might be missed.
Yeah it's interesting actually - because of the way the motte is displayed on my phone, it placed "Does driving the truck not open up possibilities of non-" on the first line and "garbage truck driving?" on the second, and due to that separation I intuitively read it as non 'garbage truck driving', so same business, but not in a truck. But when I quoted your post after you explained what you meant it printed non-garbage truck driving on the same line, and it was obvious what you originally meant. Sorry for my confusion.
Anyway it does for sure, but council truck driving is nothing like private truck driving. Despite being the most precious person I know when it comes to smells, I'd be happy to get a job driving a garbage truck if I was out of work. But you'd never convince me to drive trucks interstate or for earthworking. The amount of money you get for the work and risk is completely out of whack.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Even lower management is probably hard-gated by a degree requirement that is likely out of reach for the sorts of people who become garbage men.
But my experience in blue collar jobs is that there’s probably a few jobs like ‘route lead’ or ‘shop coordinator’ which are management in all but name and basically the senior non-coms of the place. Those jobs are probably available to garbage truck drivers after 10 years or so.
Sorry, I meant my comment more as "does driving the garbage truck not open up opportunities for truck driving in general?"
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link