This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I agree with everything here but if you're looking for an answer to the outrage it's very simple. They want something they can't have and are upset about it. There isn't some coherent and well thought out world view behind the outrage. They are simply covetous and they channel it into moral outrage because it's cathartic.
When it didn't rain this season and your tribe needed to raid the tribe next door or starve it is handy to be able to channel covetousness into murderous rage. Accusing them of hexing your fields isn't a claim Antje is going to bother formalizing.
This is not at all true. People don't like scalpers because they are jerks, plain and simple. They are reducing the available supply at the original price and selling it at a higher price just to gouge people. I hate scalpers who scalp things I don't want just as much as I hate scalpers who scalp things I do want.
The original supply at the original price was already too small for most people to get a ticket. The scalpers are redistributing tickets among the group who would've originally bought tickets, and extracting some surplus for the redistribution, but the same number of people still end up with tickets.
Right, but at higher prices than they would have otherwise had to pay. That sounds like a jerk thing to me.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
If it weren't for scalpers reselling tickets, assuming prices were kept artificially low, I would pretty much never get to go to a concert because I can't block time in my schedule far enough ahead of time to buy tickets the millisecond they release. Reselling is a reasonable service that makes people like me who buy at the last minute pay a premium that we're willing to pay, if the original sellers are giving them an unreasonable amount of market that's the original seller's fault.
No, it's still the fault of scalpers for choosing to scalp. Giving someone opportunity, even incentive, to do something does not make it your fault if they do it.
aquota is claiming they provide a useful service that they are incentivized for (making it possible to buy tickets over a long period of time by increasing price), which makes it no longer 'their fault' for doing something bad
First, it's not a useful service. It's just skimming off the top because they can.
Second, even if it were useful, that wouldn't actually matter. It's still their fault for the actions they take.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
The counter argument is that you wouldn't need to book time to buy the tickets the millisecond they came out if scalpers weren't all doing exactly that with the intention of reselling them down the line.
If the scalpers are able to up sell as much as they do that implies to me these venues would sell out quite quickly, and buying single tickets of people who had their plans change is an awful experience compared to a relatively reputable reseller.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link