site banner

Friday Fun Thread for February 28, 2025

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

0
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This particular court opinion addresses only the concrete-and-steel casks themselves, not the plutonium-etc. waste within the casks. (See footnote 5 on page 11.) It is entirely possible that your solution will be adopted in future proceedings in this case.

The concrete-and-steel casks themselves

Shouldn't these casks also have negative value, at least he occupied ones? Even if you empty them, presumably the cask has been neutron activated and would have to be disposed of as low-level waste. Or is the value positive, because if you transfer the waste out you could reuse the cask for new waste?

I now have checked the court filings. It appears that, so far, absolutely zero mention has been made of the actual value of the casks or of the nuclear waste. The complaint alleges only that the assessed value of the entire parcel (a defunct nuclear power plant that is being decommissioned; 40 M$ for land and 70 M$ for improvements) is too high. Presumably, the parties will not start arguing over the actual value until after this court opinion regarding taxability has finished the entire appeals process.