site banner
PaperclipPerfector  5d ago (text post)   25110 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of February 17, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Full text cause I don't see it's linked yet: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/ensuring-accountability-for-all-agencies/

Here are my thoughts on this. US Congress writes the Laws. But Congress is (1) Lazy and (2) are Accustomed to Trust "Experts" and (3) it's Hard to Wrangle 538 Congressperson, so Congress created "Independent Agencies" that has Regulatory Powers. The Crux is (1) "What are Regulatory Powers?" and (2) "Who should/would Enforce these Non-Congress-Originated but Congress-Implicitly-Approved Regulatory Powers?".

Now if Congress wants to Rein in Trump, all they have to do is (1) make clearer Laws on Regulatory Delegation of Powers + Enforcement Mechanism, or (2) if they want to go back to the Old Implicit/Nebulous Ways, Impeach and Remove Trump from Office. This obviously Runs into the Category of "Simple, but Hard" things to do ("cut back on food + exercise more" is an example in this category for me).

I want to Note that it seems the Current Law is not very Clear, even in this substack explaining the situation that was linked on howappealing. Here's a quote:

But the general understanding has long been that [Independent Agencies] are special, in the sense that they are “independent” of the Commander-in-Chief.

Note the word "understanding". Presidents and Congress and Lawmakers and Lawyers and Agencies and Experts etc. has kept Passing the Buck on making things Clear. And there is something to be said about "the Tyranny of Structureless", which can be neatly summarized as:

this apparent lack of structure often disguised an informal, unacknowledged, and unaccountable Leadership that was all the more pernicious because its very existence was denied.

Is what Trump doing Alarming? Yeah? Probably? But to me, currently, the More Alarming thing Continues to be Congress and their Dereliction of Duty in Producing Laws. All the Criticism of Judges "Legislating from the Bench" or Presidents being "Unilateral" are just Downstream Effects of Congress Not Upholding their End of the Constitutional Order. The People's Will and Need for Legislation are Not Satisfied by Congress's Slowness, so the Outlet is to naturally find Champions that would Do what the People want, whether that's through the Executive or the Judiciary.

ps: tried to get chatgpt to uppercase the first letter of some words like old political texts but didn't really work out :/

ps: tried to get chatgpt to uppercase the first letter of some words like old political texts but didn't really work out :/

Where is the gpt text?

I had to recreate it but chatgpt's output just uppercase almost all the words https://chatgpt.com/share/67b8d1a9-6784-8003-a263-feb006d87a81

ps: tried to get chatgpt to uppercase the first letter of some words like old political texts but didn't really work out :/

I thought it worked out great! I loved reading it. Reminds me of the Terra Ignota series.

hahaha, yeah, had to do it manually. chatgpt just uppercase almost all the words https://chatgpt.com/share/67b8d1a9-6784-8003-a263-feb006d87a81

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats