This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'd be absolutely fine with an agency dedicated to "fucking shit up" and personally wrecking these fraudulent people's whole industry. Maybe there should be staffers from DOGE personally assigned to each of these medical companies, with their sole job being scrutinizing their financials, practice, hell maybe DOGE should be in the e-mail/phone loop with each doctor that's being billed shit.
Use modern tech, hell involve publicly auditable blockchains if you must. A god damned public read only SQL database would even be a start.
The problem with making things publicly auditable is that it exposes the loopholes and therefore makes it easier for any chancer to try to get on the fraud train. It would be like exposing the inner details of the IRS’ investigation process, it wouldn’t lead to less tax evasion, just more efficient and more effective forms of it.
It's almost impossible to escape fair and simple taxation. Not worth the money even.
Loopholes exist because there's an entire industry of lawyers paid to exploit them and politicians create new ones to reward their allies all the time.
In a properly setup taxation scheme, there would be no need for the IRS. At best you'd only need a small legion of accountants to enforce a simple formula.
And that's just with 2000s technology. Nowadays if you actually wanted to implement a modern and efficient taxation scheme from scratch, you probably only need as many bureaucrats as DOGE has to operate it. Everything can be done on chain in a way that is both private and traceable.
And this is all the more absurd now that the point of taxation isn't even to fund USG but to take money out of circulation.
Let’s say you own business asset A. You want to incorporate it for legal protection. Should you be taxed?
What if you transfer that asset (say it’s worth 10m) to Apple for shares?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link