This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I sympathize with the sentiment, but it seems hard to achieve. Consider that the quoted paragraph comes from a book that argues for what you want quite explicitly, the problem is that the chapter that promises to deliver solutions and outline a vision for the future is by far the shortest and the most vague. Most people who want this don't seem to know how.
The Amish are one of the few groups that seems to achieve some version of this in a sustainable manner, but most people looking for alternative economic arrangements don't seem to like them very much.
The Amish? They seem to me to be a pretty good example of what he said this vision is not: "Its members do not mechanically play from some given score, written by a despotic musical mind". Amish life seems pretty strict, bounded on one side by the reality of being a roughly 19th century farmer and on another by the various Ordnungs, which by the time you are considered worth having a serious say in them, you've lived under them long enough to internalize them.
Given how much I romanticize them, I probably should grit my teeth and actually learn how the Amish do things, but my understanding is that they do neither central economic planning nor rely solely on collective property, however they do a lot of economic projects, like building a barn for a neighbor, as a community. This may very well involve some authoritarian measures regarding their lifestyle, which means it's not exactly an improv music troupe, but my point is this is the closest you'll get to it in a sustainable way. If you don't like the hyper-individualism of liberal capitalism, you'll need something that inculcates a sense of duty towards the community in the average person, not rather than hoping you can free-ride on "
millionaires andbillionaires".More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link