This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Carl was a meme, he was called the soyfather, lost debates to metokur, Spencer and was the biggest lolcow. People even made fun of his personal life for marrying a single mom.
Seeing him go from that to making decent critical remarks is astounding. He left for a bit, came back and rightfully criticised nationalism and the lib washing. People don't change much post 40 so I'm quite happy to see him change for the better.
Ubersoy is another guy who is on a similar quest, not same sincebut he calls his project right wing progressivism. The big question for me is how you would get people to cooperate only for values. Religiosity is necessary for cooperation on a society wide scale, spandrell is correct to point this out so I am ultimately not very optimistic about this. People need irrational myths to believe in to cooperate for generations despite bloodshed with their own kin. Still, it's a good project by these two.
I do have sympathy for him, he's clearly not in a good place mentally for the past few months, I won't be surprised if he apolgises for this later like how kanye did for his remarks about the ss.
It's always acceptable to bully intellectuals. If there was a French chad in the 1970s who called Foucault a fag and exposed him as a homosexual pederast, then the modern world would be much more tolerable.
If Carl wasn't called the soyfather by some internet frog, he probably would have written a well-received, New York Times best selling 'How It's Based To Marry Single Moms and Raise Another Man's Child." Intellectualism is not an end of itself: you get off once you reach the desired destination.
Based af. Luke Smith has great videos agaisnt nerd spergery and another on why it's good to bully intellectuals like taleb.
Society needs to disincentivise bitch ass behavior. I got told pretty firmly by guys here when I acted like a wuss in my personal life, bullying works, kinda.
More options
Context Copy link
There is nothing wrong with raising another man's child (provided you have children of your own, or you're some sort of priest).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link