site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1mo ago (text post)   2809 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for September 29, 2024

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

1
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is the anxiety about the 1st few months? How much do the existing antivirals and the approved vaccine temper their perception of things? Sequiris has been groomed for a few years by ASPR to be in a position to rapidly scale up their manufacturing, and they already have (a very small) global distribution of it. BARDA is probably going to announce and grant them a treasure trove if there's actually a pandemic.

As demonstrated elsewhere in this thread, support for lockdowns/masks/precautions is very low, and even traditional supporters are going to be banging the economic drum.

This will likely kill much more young people before whatever crazy new technology we have gets approved and rolled out. At least thats the feeling.

I think it may be a bit doomer but the worse than COVID and COVID exhaustion bits are very real.

Ok, I understand where you're coming from now. I think if there's a pandemic it will be hellish for anyone working in healthcare. On the other hand Audenz was already approved by FDA and updating the formulation with antigens for new strains doesn't require new clinical trials to be reviewed by the agency before the supplemental formulation is approved. The rollout preparedness is (relatively) good already. They've just spun up manufacturing a 40 million dose stockpile of only the adjuvant from a $121 million BARDA grant, but that's mostly just to get Sequiris' manufacturing flywheel started. Probably 6 months until vulnerable populations start getting administered a vaccine from whenever a pandemic is declared, with a 1 month margin of error. So if the vaccine actually works that writes off the most apocalyptic outcomes.

I think if there's a pandemic it will be hellish for anyone working in healthcare.

I'm not concerned about the apocalypse, even without any further technology changes but I am concerned about stuff like people dying at their homes of heart attacks because ambulances are overstretched and we don't have the resources in the ED or hospital to handle otherwise treatable problems.

Like with COVD damage to the complex systems involved will take a long time to clear, if ever.

Not to mention medical professionals getting sick at a (much) higher rate than the general population, further decreasing the capacity. That already had an effect here in Finland during Covid.

This still isn’t the Black Death 2.0. Literal worst case scenarios are still nowhere near what the virus was sold as.

Society didn't end and wasn't going to, but we did almost lose access to healthcare which is quite a bad outcome.

We weren’t going to lose access to healthcare, we were going to get healthcare rationed. Not that bad, or anywhere near bad enough to justify the lunatic reaction to it.

It was going to be disorganized though, rationing requires central planning, this would be collapse with attempts at keeping things going.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats