This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Why does the Audubon society have a union? Like do they actually employ that many people in normally union roles, or is this mostly thinking unions sound cool?
Why wouldn't they have a union? It's in every corporation's self-interest to become a monopsony on labor so they can pay below market equilibrium rates for talent. It's in every worker's interest to become part of a monopoly on labor so they can force pay above market equilibrium.
It's not in my interest now. It wasn't in my interest when I did factory work either. I've never had a job where I perceived it to be in my interest.
Did it never occur to you that earning more money for doing the same work would be better for you?
Sure. I'd also like a pony, and to rob banks and shoot it out with the police without all the pesky bleeding and screaming and dying. Sadly, reality intrudes.
When I observe unionized workplaces, I see inefficiency, doors closed to good workers, and economic failure. By contrast, the workplaces I've observed that were most efficient, dynamic and productive were, as a rule, not unionized. I like being able to find a job by demonstrating positive value to a prospective employer offering what I consider a reasonable wage, without then having to persuade a second group of people who believe that they have a direct economic interest in keeping me unemployed.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Have you ever ever obtained any sort of credential with a barrier to entry that enabled you to do specialized, abnormally renumerative work? If so, that's exactly the sort off thing I'm talking about. Unions are only one of many ways to obtain a labor monopoly.
I got a forklift certification once. Does that count as a "labor monopoly"? I think I'm pretty glad that forklift operators are required to undergo safety training and a comprehension and skills test, but I'm not sure what that has to do with unions.
Other than the forklift certification, no, I've never gained any credential of the sort you describe.
If you got the forklift certification because you expected to make more money-- because the pool workers legally allowed to do jobs involving forklifts is artificially constrained by the certification process-- then you've benefited from the same economic mechanism unions do.
Morally, you're free to make a distinction between getting a forklift certification versus forming an insulin cartel or shutting down imports across the country to get $2 more an hour. But mechanically and economically, it's the same sort of behavior guided by the same sorts of incentives.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
To engage in group negotiation over wages, benefits, and working conditions, because that's a stronger bargaining position than letting every employee bargain individually, and people on the left tend to think that's a positive good even if the employer is currently claiming to be benevolent?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link