site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of August 12, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When we send a soldier to die in war, for no other reason than that it retains a territorial claim with economic benefit, we are making a transaction of human life for “communal wellbeing”. And this is common in history, including nearly all Catholic countries.

Literally no one, including today, sees territorial claims as being maintained solely or primarily for economic benefit.

Have you heard of guano islands? The sugar trade? Colonial possessions? The whole history of European war in the colonial era is mixed with fighting other nations for territorial claims wherein the territory has economic benefit and nothing else. Russia today is preparing for war in the arctic involving its territorial resources, and China over fishing areas.

Are you? Or do you actually think Russia is invading Ukraine to get a few more scheckles?

In the end, the question of geopolitical dominance for someone who isn't race essentialist or heavily religious or something like that rests on the economic benefits of being the local hegemon, and the disadvantages of being a fractured gas station. I don't think anyone in the Kremlin who matters really believes physical genocide of Russians is in the cards, so that leaves submission and destitution.

While this may or may not apply to Russia, there's several dictators who could easily negotiate an agreement with the west, of yielding power for what would be untold riches (compared to what they have now), but prefer to be kings of the ashes. Money isn't everything.

The argument rests on the widespread occurrence of war over purely economic territorial claims. It does not rest on every territorial claim involving purely economic motives.

I'll go out on a limb and say even the wars that we see as "purely economic" in retrospect, were justified on other grounds to people fighting them at the time.