This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The clergy is a high status career in the red tribe, and not something seen as potentially disappointing- unless of course that clergyman winds up in a scandal.
Likewise, high status military careers, even enlisted ones(like special forces, helicopter pilot, sniper etc) are totally acceptable for a red tribe boy from a well off or even elite family. Cop, tradesman, etc might be mildly disappointing if the family is wealthy, although it is respected; prison guard definitely is. A girl is probably not going to be encouraged towards those careers, of course. Teaching is an acceptable career path for both sexes, although a boy might be advised to pick a career which pays better. Indeed there are lots of red tribe teachers, they’re just a lot more likely to quit when they get married. Musician is not even viewed as a real career, but humanities professor is an acceptable normal job assuming you’re talking about something like history or English- gender studies would not be.
In any case I was assuming that there was enough red/blue mixture at the top end of the ladder through rich people stuff that running into eg a marine officer, pilot, pastor, or policeman in the fringes of one’s social circles isn’t implausible for a wealthy blue triber, just like running into a symphonist or whatever is plausible for a wealthy red triber(although probably not a poor one).
The devil is always in the details and the PMC loves to build its special statuses.
Pete Buttigieg joined the Navy through what's called a Direct Commission Officer program when he was 37 years old. Specifically, he joined a Reserve Intelligence Officer program that is notorious for being the place that politically or just generally striver minded over-acheivers go to tick off the "military service" box. That Navy program has an insanely high proportion of Harvard grads, lawyers, masters degree holders etc. And they often are commissioning in their mid 30s whereas your normal ROTC grad is in at 22 with enlisted being 18,19, or 20 usually.
And it's a Club Med of an assignment. First off, it's the reserves. When they do deploy, they're treated like retarded children (because they are). I won't get into the Mayor Pete Afghanistan stories (plenty to Google there). But it's all basically a farce.
Elite Blue Tribers understand that military service (especially post 9/11) has a ton of bipartisan cultural cache. So they've done what they always do and created as special carve out that, to the general public, looks great. This is actually the same thing that the Harvard Kennedy School does - they admit anyone, or give them some sort of status as a Fellow or something.
Contrast this with a kid at Harvard, Yale etc. who, on day one, goes for a NROTC scholarship with a signed contract for active duty Marine Corps ground officer (which likely means he ends up in infantry, artillery, etc.) That can and will get Mummie and Dad-da out of their recliners in Montpelier and on the train to the dorms. Think about the ssssssscandal if junior had deferred his entree to Yale and enlisted as a common phoot-soldier in the Army. Perish the thought.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link