BANNED USER: Repeated antagonism
>Unban in 4d 05h 35m
UrgentSloth
No bio...
User ID: 3357
Banned by: @Amadan
This mod is deliberately crafting an echochamber.
That's what I believe, and this mod has no problem with people baselessly asserting their insulting beliefs.
Say there is a powerful government official who wants to do these things to you.
Would you rather live in Earth 1 where there is due process, or Earth 2 where there isn't?
It's not "due process " which is costing you hundreds of thousands. It's the bad government official, and due process is protecting you from them, even if it sucks.
It hurting to be shot while wearing a bullet proof vest doesn't make the vest a weapon of the enemy.
Due process is never a weapon.
The denial of it is the weapon.
I do not want my side to read from the book your side is cracking open.
Neither of us can do anything to stop these things. I just hope for you to see THAT IT IS BAD.
Is the number of people who think this way above 100 in the country?
I would also approve of this. I would also be perfectly content with the US government bringing him back, and then sending him to some other willing or bribed country.
Edit: so if there's already 2 in this tiny space, I'm guessing there are at least 10s of thousands of us.
If the cops pick me up and toss me in jail because they have a warrant for my arrest they didn't know was cancelled, my due process rights are not being violated. I am a victim of a procedural deficiency. To say that my right to due process has been violated would be incorrect.
This is highly fact pattern specific.
If you are convicted of pot distribution and jailed, put on death row, and speedily executed. I'm sure you'd agree that you were denied due process.
They don't. They are simply lying. Yes, it is my belief that to say Garcia was "denied due process" is a lie.
Fuck you.
The due process needed here was 90 seconds in front of a judge to say "I have a withholding order against being removed to El Salvador." The same 90 seconds I need to be able to say "I'm a fucking citizen, please stop these thugs."
Garcia didn't get his, and you or I may not get ours (respectively, depending on who wins '28).
I entirely agree that the "due process" we're talking about here is something very different than that at a criminal trial.
But what I think you're ignoring is that while Garcia is not a citizen, he also wasn't supposed to be sent to El Salvador and there was no opportunity for him to assert that. If he has no chance to say "Hey judge, this shouldn't be happening because I have a no-removal-to-El-salvador order" then I infer that I won't have a chance to say "Hey judge, I'm a citizen."
I suspect a confusion between U.S.C and C.F.R.
they see no meaningful difference between him and a legal US citizen, and so there is no Schelling Fence that can be drawn between the two
You are not accurately modeling this view.
They absolutely see a difference between Garcia and a citizen.
What worries them is that the process afforded Garcia is not constructed in such a way that it must differentiate between Garcia and the citizen.
Only insofar as the anti-immigration party in power refuses to fund additional detention facilities.
You shouldn't even allow that this decision requires anyone to be "on the loose."
It doesn't.
What's unusual is that a significant chunk of the population feels like they can predict further decreases in the stock market.
Because the moron with the tariff button still has the tariff button.
This reads as if you are trying to paper over how Hoffmeister and others on your side do not care about actual citizens.
Deporting illegals. Fine, that's a total valid outcome for Trump winning an election.
Celebrating the cleaving of an American citizen from their spouse and parent? That's wrong, and I think you know it.
They are not American to you.
Your attitude makes you unworthy of being an American to me.
So goes our country.
That's fair. Thanks!
Do you have a source for this claim that the documents at issue in her case were classified outside of state?
I've never seen that claim before signalgate. Source?
I suspected but didn't want to assume.
Why do you think she didn't have Original Classification Authority?
Who are you talking about?
Since I have no interest in their heartland, no not really.
Gonna suck for you when thenother side wins by 1.5% and starts their "civilizational moment", huh?
That's not interpretation. That's re-writing.
I'm sorry, are you disputing that he wrote "normalize Indian hate" or are you just refusing to address that sentiment?
That's not what he wrote.
- Prev
- Next
You're a liar.
More options
Context Copy link