@SubstantialFrivolity's banner p

SubstantialFrivolity

I'm not even supposed to be here today

5 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 22:41:30 UTC
Verified Email

				

User ID: 225

SubstantialFrivolity

I'm not even supposed to be here today

5 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 22:41:30 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 225

Verified Email

I agree that it's only important she doesn't hate your hobbies. If she shares them, cool, but it ultimately isn't a big deal. It's healthy for a couple to have interests outside of each other anyway, you don't have to be into the same exact pastimes.

I would also add, upon reflection, that how early you bring up issues is largely proportional to how important they are to you. If watching anime is the most important thing in your life, and you would never accept anything less than the most weeb existence imaginable, then it makes sense to mention it as soon as possible so you aren't wasting your time. But if it's just something you do on occasion, it isn't something you really need to prioritize mentioning in conversation.

That is almost certainly what would happen, based on how other tech has gone.

You honestly and straightforwardly say what you do for fun. You don't want to invest a bunch of time and emotional energy into a girl only to find out she hates your hobbies, get stuff out of the way up front.

You can also just sit in the pew, of course. That's what I do (due to an issue where my marriage is considered invalid by the Church, and my wife doesn't want to go through the convalidation process).

Maybe, maybe not. But people are not so dispassionate about their homes as that. At some point, yes, the damage from war gets to be so bad that people will accept foreign occupation rather than continue the war (otherwise wars would never end other than annihilation), but it takes time for the losses to get to be painful enough that people will accept losing their home to the foreign invaders.

Second this. It's the only Youtube channel I find actually worth paying for.

It is true that going back to Reddit would lead to an increase in new posters, but it seems to me that this community would make it less than a year before being banned. Reddit site policy is very clear that a number of left-wing positions are sacrosanct, and this community would not respect that at all (which is kind of the whole point, discussing ideas without respect to sacred cows). I don't think that it would be ultimately beneficial to get new posters but then have the community die (or have to migrate back off again).

Yes and no. Yes, we are stewards of the world and owe it to God to treat his gift with respect. But no, that is not an absolute goal - this world is not our home, and if there is a conflict between our spiritual obligations and our material ones, the spiritual ones take precedence.

Note that I'm not saying Christians have an obligation to avoid dealing with people who do weird sex stuff. Just saying if someone did conclude that, even the fact that it might blow up the world as a consequence would not override the spiritual obligation.

You're confusing a lack of re-litigation with agreement. I thought, and still think, that AI discussion doesn't belong in the CW thread. But we already had the discussion and the community decided it was fine, so why would I continue to argue the point?

If you have a device which allows you to read the minds of other men, by all means, share it with us so we can all use such a useful tool. But for my part at least, you are wrong. I derive meaning from my work because of the satisfaction of a job well done and making the world around me a tiny bit better, not because I'm a narcissist who secretly glories in being better than others.

We aren't arguing about it because there's no point. At this point, both sides have tired of trying to convince each other, each still thinks they are right, and each still thinks the other is willfully ignoring evidence that disproves their POV. What's there to argue about any more? Life's too short.

I'm American and I have never even heard of these people. I have no idea why @magicalkittycat finds this interesting, but it definitely isn't something that would be of interest to most Americans imo.

I'm going to push back on this some:

And yet, the vast, vast majority of women aren't pulling out their boobs on instagram. They just don't like being told they can't or shouldn't do it. And that was literally just Instagram setting their user policy! Not a legal restriction!

Women do that when anyone tries to police female behavior, anywhere.

Nobody likes having their behavior restricted, men or women. Maybe it's an American thing, but it certainly isn't a women thing. I have no desire to paint my house bright pink, but if my city tried to pass an ordinance forbidding that, you best believe I would be at the meetings protesting. People of both genders don't like being told what to do, whether or not they intend to do it.

The advantages to behaving like a lady are so great, I don't understand why more men and women don't try to give their daughters this advantage. Do they just not know? Do they think this behavior is incompatible with also being intelligent, educated, and highly-paid? Do they think it's just too hard?

Our culture, in general, believes that almost any suggestion to not maximize pleasure in the moment is evil and oppressive. That is a lie, of course, but it is one which is widely believed. So many parents of daughters don't try to teach them to act ladylike in the way you described, because they have been deceived with a lie that this would oppress their daughters and make them unhappy.

Many MMO players are the kings of optimizing the fun right out of a game. I played both WoW and FF14 for years, and I would see so many people playing in ways they admitted were less fun, just because it was an extra 1% more DPS or whatever. Absolute lunacy.

Literal Jetsons tech or not, I like to own things, not rent things. Though in fairness they used to offer that as an option, not sure if they still do.

The "rule" is that the first person pronoun always comes last. Of course, nobody follows this...

I follow it religiously. Not my fault so many people suck at their native language.

Any primers on contemplative prayer that you can recommend?

The second post you quoted made me laugh. Because while that person is clearly trying to be sarcastic, wearing masks at this point is unpopular and impractical. The fact that the poster thinks it's a perfectly reasonable idea does not change the fact that people overwhelmingly disagree with him.

The AP style guide is straightforwardly correct. LLMs are computer programs, not living things (let alone sentient). And while it would be fine to use the anthropomorphizing language if people actually understood that, they really don't. Look at Richard Dawkins or Kent Overstreet for example. Smart people, but completely taken in by the false belief that the machine is a sentient being. So, until more people come to understand that the clanker is just a machine, it makes sense to avoid using language that will mislead them.

Didn’t know they cared so much about forcing businesses to move their hosting on-prem but okay!

yeschad.jpg

PaaS and SaaS is not a good solution for most businesses, frankly. The good cases do exist, but I've personally seen businesses which are losing money using AWS instead of having a server room or two, all because on-prem isn't trendy so the execs don't like it.

Sure, I wouldn't expect you to know. Heck, it might be the case that your co-workers are all genuinely enthusiastic. Just noting that I have seen people hiding negative opinions and only being open with someone they trust, so it's not out of the realm is possibility.

They certainly are where I work, because it's been made clear that if you have negative opinions on AI you might get fired for that. It may or may not be similar where you work, but in my experience there is a climate of "get on board with this or get out" without any respect for honest differences of opinion between professionals. That certainly chills discussion.

As for companies, they are indeed not rejecting AI. But that is driven by the corpo executive types, not programmers. Among actual programmers, my experience has been that it's fairly evenly split between people who are to some degree enthusiastic about AI, and people who don't find it useful. Of the latter, very few are flat out refusing to use it, but of course it's not like the rest have much of a choice given the current state of the industry. Even if they think it's an ineffective tool, not many are so strongly opposed that they will risk their livelihoods over it.

In software it's mostly accepted in professional circles that AI was used.

Not really. It's still very controversial in the tech community, with some embracing it and some rejecting it.