SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
No bio...
User ID: 225
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
I think that would be a significant challenge for sure. The only way it works is if there are no exceptions. Not for teachers, not for our troops, not for Grandma who has cancer, none. I'm willing to grit my teeth as the things I care about get hit, but I don't think most Americans are.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
That I don't know, unfortunately.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
Accordingly, your demand that you benefit
That is not actually my position. I demand that, after I have been forced to pay money in, that money isn't just ripped away to balance the budget. I accept that, if we stop trying to prop it up, social security is likely to run out of money long before I see a dime. I'm ok with that (relatively speaking). My demand is that we let the money run out first, not just pull the plug. The former is unfortunate but unavoidable, the latter is a vicious slap in the face to everyone who has been forced to pay into this bad program.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
I'm not saying it's the best solution. I'm well aware it would have problems! But we absolutely have to stop racking up debt. The problems you mention are real, but less bad than the status quo.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
I want to fix the budget, but I'm less than stoked about robbing me of the money I was forced to pay to social security in order to do it. Personally, I think that if politicians can't agree on what to cut (which is a likely outcome TBH) we should just cut all budgets at the federal level by x% in order to make it happen. For example, if we need to cut spending by 20%, every single department budget gets slashed by 20%. No exceptions. While it would be better if our representatives could agree what needs to be cut, this would at least be better than the current status quo where the US just keeps borrowing money it's never, ever going to pay back.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
None of which changes the fact that I, as a person who lives here, has not experienced what OP is saying. Homeless people are around (and have been for the decade I've lived here), but the camps are not super common and get broken up by police from time to time. I've never seen a homeless person committing crimes. I've never had my car stolen, nor has anyone I know.
Stats are all well and good. I'm not even saying your stats are wrong. But the claim I was responding to was "we've all experienced this", and the answer is "no we haven't". Just because something is happening statistically does not mean it is actually affecting the experience of people.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
Have we not all experienced basically the same thing across many different cities?
No, I haven't. Currently living in Denver, CO and I have yet to see the kind of things OP described. I agree with @OliveTapenade that it is beneficial to the discussion to say where one is talking about. No shame if someone declines to specify, of course, but it's perfectly reasonable to ask
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
I definitely think they shouldn't be. But unfortunately, some people think it is OK to hand down guilt through the generations like you describe, which is why we have the land acknowledgements to begin with.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
Yeah, I don't think some guy doing sexual things with his daughter is funny either. More, "wow there are some degenerate people in this world".
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
Dude, that looks beautiful. I salute your skill at creating something so nice, it must have taken quite a bit of practice to get to that point.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
Bungie is similarly good at making games that feel good - say what you will about Destiny or Destiny 2, it is fun to shoot guns in those games. Unfortunately, they are also pretty iffy these days on translating those good fundamentals into games that are overall fun.
I'm not here to change your mind, but to agree with you. BotW was a huge disappointment and I stopped playing it after 10-20h (guessing) and I did the first divine beast (the mammoth). I didn't even bother with TotK because I had no desire to get that disappointment again.
First, I'll say that I play Zelda games for the dungeons. I want to go to cool places, solve fun puzzles, and get neat items that unlock more puzzles. I'm not interested in the world, which is really just connective tissue between the actual good parts of the game (though some games have more interesting overworlds than others). So right off the bat, BotW was off on the wrong foot. Only four dungeons? Not a good sign. But the shrines do exist, so I figured that might make up for it.
Turns out that the shrines don't really do it for me at all. They are so short that right as I'm getting into the groove and having fun, it's all over. Additionally, as you get all the items at the beginning of the game they don't engage you in new ways the way other Zelda games do. On top of that, the one divine beast I did (the actual dungeon!) was super short and simple. It took me maybe 20-30 minutes. So the main draw of Zelda for me was a big fat bust.
On top of that, the game screwed up one of the other things I love about Zelda, which is the music. Most Zelda soundtracks are packed with bangers, so I figured that I'd like the music at least. But no, it's all ambient piano shit. I know opinions vary, but ambient music is fucking boring. It was awful having to listen to that everywhere I went. I know they recorded real music for the game, it was in some of the trailers. But I never heard it when I played. Huge letdown.
On top of all that, I hated traversing the world. Ostensibly the main draw of the game, I found it to be both unreasonably big, and devoid of anything interesting. So not only were the shrines and dungeons not very good, they were connected by a painful slog through the world every time I wanted to get to one. The world, by itself, would have put a serious damper on my opinion of the game. But when it wasn't firing on any other cylinders either, it was unbearable.
Overall, I rate BotW 2/5 stars at best. It's beautiful to look at, and the physics are fun, but there's nothing interesting there in the long run. It's a terrible Zelda.
Edit: oh yeah I forgot to mention the equipment durability system. It fucking sucks (as all such systems do). People hated it in Skyward Sword, so why on earth did Nintendo think it was a good idea to bring it back? And from what I've heard it's even worse because it applies to the Master Sword (albeit just disabling it temporarily rather than destroying it). At least in SS, they had the sense to make the iconic Hylian Shield exempt from the durability system. If they had to keep durability (which they shouldn't have), they at least should've made the Master Sword similarly exempt.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
it's nothing too exceptionally different than what everyone else in America has accepted as par for the course for flying nowadays
That's probably true, but the status quo of flying nowadays is already a gross violation of our civil liberties. It is absolutely reprehensible that the TSA is allowed to exist on that basis alone, let alone the massive waste of taxpayer funds that they incur. And on top of that, it turns out that there's politically motivated harassment going on? Hell no! These organizations never should've been allowed to form in the first place, but they must not be allowed to stay.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
I don't understand how that disagrees with what I said?
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
Sure, I'm not saying the elected representatives necessarily correctly deliver on the will of the people. Lord knows they rarely do in the US. I just think it's inaccurate to claim that the people living in the UK don't have the right to decide to let in a flood of migrants.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
It isn't up to the current people to give it away to strangers.
It actually is. For better or for worse, having a democratic society means that the people get to make such decisions.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
I read this and was pretty outraged, though unsurprised. I have felt from the very beginning that the DHS (and by extension the TSA) is one big violation of our civil liberties waiting to happen, so it's unfortunately not shocking to me when I see them doing police state shit like this. I would love for both departments to be utterly abolished, but unfortunately that's not going to happen in my lifetime.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
According to Wikipedia, yeah his father was purged during the Cultural Revolution. Not that I'm a fan of Pooh-bear, but it makes me kind of happy in the schadenfreude sense to learn that. Mao was an utter shit-bag, and I am amused by imagining how mad he would be if he found out that the son of the guy he purged is now running the country.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
It's both, depending on context. Republicans consider themselves the adults in the room in the sense that they think they are the ones willing to do the messy business of doing what needs to be done to keep this country going strong, and being true to traditional morals rather than what they consider to be frivolous and immature lifestyles on the left. Democrats consider themselves the adults in the room because they think Trump is utterly insane, and they think they are the only ones willing to stand up to his brand of insanity and act like grown-ups.
From my point of view neither is really the adults in the room, but that's what they seem to think of themselves at any rate.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
Damn this was a good post. I like your thesis a lot, it makes sense but I had never considered it before. I almost hope you're wrong, because if you're right it is another sad testament to the dangers of ignoring Chesterton's Fence. It seems like a real sad statement about Western society if we took the social roles developed around the strong (though not inexorable) innate drives of the sexes, and then tore those social roles down without ever bothering to understand why they worked.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
Kind of off-topic, but what the hell is that columnist smoking!? No, a boy who goes "don't worry, I have pads just in case my friends need one" would not be drowning in prom invites. He would be relentlessly mocked and ostracized for that behavior. The only scenario in which it would perhaps go the boy's way is if he was hot, in which case he doesn't need to do that to attract girls anyway. Just an absolutely bizarre take that makes me wonder what the heck the writer is even thinking.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
if you are rewarded for recklessness (or punished for prudence) a lot of the time and only punished for recklessness when something goes wrong, the punishment when something goes wrong needs to be large to outweigh the benefit and thus provide a net disincentive.
Losing your job is already a pretty big disincentive (assuming no golden parachute shenanigans). I don't think it needs to be bigger than that necessarily. On top of that, there's every reason to believe that the company is going to struggle financially as customers bail - this is further disincentive at the company level, and will affect the decision making at the individual level.
I hear that it's basically required in a bunch of fields for regulatory compliance purposes; is that not so? Also, uh, I can't get any hard numbers but I'm guessing a bunch of people died due to hospitals getting hit. When you're playing the government-contracts game, there are responsibilities attached to that.
Crowdstrike is not required, security measures are required. It's up to the regulated organization to choose how to implement that requirement. I don't think that they become critical infrastructure just because critical infrastructure orgs choose to make use of them.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
For what it's worth, I kind of love it when you tap the sign. It's a well written post and I enjoy reading it every so often.
SubstantialFrivolity
I'm not even supposed to be here today
3mo ago
This is how we get hundred billion dollar black holes, massive financial crises, wars that go nowhere based on pure fantasy and defiance of reality, 20 years of barking up the wrong tree on Alzheimers research due to fraud...
No, we get that by rewarding incompetence (there's that sign tap again...). We don't need to overcorrect to fix that, we just need to actually punish those people instead of promoting them or whatever.
I believe in regular punishment for regular incompetence but this was above and beyond anything normal. Just doing as you're told isn't good enough for critical infrastructure like this.
This isn't critical infrastructure, come on. It's freaking antivirus. It's not the only one, nor is it ubiquitous. It's just another software product.
Any normal person tests updates before releasing them.
I'm willing to bet you that the technical people did want to test updates. Maybe their direct managers did too, although that I'm less certain about. But at the end of the day, when your boss says "do this or else", very few people are willing to take the "or else" option. That's not unreasonable of them.
And in the case of egregious failures where the whole organization has gone badly off the rails, why should anyone trust that they'd do a proper post-mortem?
Because they did.
Furthermore, punishment enhances public trust that everyone is in it together.
We're gonna have to agree to disagree on this one. I don't think it helps.
I'm fine with cutting off SS taxes immediately. Though from what @sarker said, that would mean that the money runs out immediately so I guess maybe it amounts to the same thing. I was under the impression that there was money left in the pot, but it sounds like I was mistaken.
More options
Context Copy link