Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
No bio...
User ID: 3132
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
19d ago
I mean, considering how dependent the entire African continent is on western aid, particularly medicinal aid, the complete extension of "deworming" rounds off to TND. The left understands this, even if only implicitly.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
20d ago
Actually, on comparison the Modern Warfare OSTs are more orchestral/cinematic than necessarily industrial, so not as quite as similar as I thought. Definitely still recommend them tho.
By the way, what didn't click with you about Isaac?
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
20d ago
· Edited 20d ago
Hoo-rah indeed. I fuck with that shit heavy, it will make a fine addition to my collection. For more like it, I'd recommend the Modern Warfare reboot soundtracks by Sarah Schachner, MW2019 and MWII.
On the subject of tactical RPGs with banger soundtracks, I've been playing through Mewgenics and I'm absolutely loving it. It's a legacy rougelite from the guy who made The Binding of Isaac where you breed cats to send them out on D&D-esque adventures. I've reached the second act of the game with 30 hours of playtime, 20% completion, and a nice bloodline going courtesy of a rare moth-cat whose mutations I bred into my kitties.
My only reservation with wholeheartedly recommending the game is the style. It's entirely typical of Ed's work, which is to say that it's unreservedly channeling early 2000's Newgrounds aesthetics and humor. It's definitely a turn-off for some, but I like it. Just be aware that there's more animate poop and mutated fetuses in it than typically expected for a game in its genre.
With respect to the OST, my favorite tracks so far are Flush, Chumbucket Kitty, and Feline Invader (little spoilery); Flush especially goes way harder than a song about literal shit has any right to.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
21d ago
I can get the appeal of sleep sex as an extension of a freeuse fetish (where the focus is on relieving oneself without the worry of mutual pleasure, essentially enhanced masturbation) but I'm baffled that you consider it a strict improvement. Not being able to see the woman in pleasure is a considerable opportunity cost, even setting aside the lost potential of her active participation.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
25d ago
Embrace war as a standard way of life. We [whites (presumably)] will fight perpetual wars, to make ourselves stronger. Some die off, but the rest become even stronger.
…this is TND with extra steps. I mean, you’re totally allowed to argue for the total dispossession of and presumed eventual extinction of the non-white/east asian peoples of the earth, but that is indeed the proximate outcome of such a Darwinian process.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
28d ago
· Edited 28d ago
That's not to say that a woman who's thin in a fit way isn't seen as attractive, straight guys really don't focus on the abdomen to the point where "fit" is meaningfully distinguished from "thin and untoned."
Huh. Surprised that it's so broad rather than just not T&A-priority, but would explain a bit.
Just my 2¢ as a straight guy, but I find moderate abdominal musculature quite attractive on women. It's not a primary feature for me, but I like how a firm tummy bridges the soft jiggly bits above and below. There's a risk of the torso becoming too boxy at a certain point, but I'm not sure how much of that effect is just anti-selection (women with great WHRs are probably less likely to get super into strength training).
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
I'd argue that what Rankine said was rude but not much more than that. It's on about the level of calling someone an "asshole" or a "retard".
I'm not sure how you don't see why the left might find the use of "faggot" objectionable in of itself. Obviously supporters of LGBTetc. would object to the use of homophobic slurs as a general-purpose insult, as it strengthens semantic associations between homosexuality and undesirability.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
they would never face the logical consequences of their actions
I mean, kinda? ICE is incidentally (and IMO, purposefully to an unknown but non-trivial degree) fulfilling the function of removing non-whites from the country, and you'll notice that almost all of the visible ICE obstructors are, ah, not the target demographic(s). Add on the pre-existing belief in white invincibility and they come to the (not wholly unjustified) conclusion that as White Saviors, they have the duty to save the helpless brown folx from the Evil Empire set on their destruction.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
The left has such open, naked hatred directed specifically at White men it just feels like self-preservation should kick in at some point and supersede the rest of your political preferences.
The hate directed from non-white leftists to their white patrons simply does not register as a threat, and this is because the left sees the white man as functionally invincible. On this point, they’re more correct than not: he is, as a matter of fact, very, very, powerful (more powerful than some on the right are willing to admit) and the gulf in capacity between himself and all non-asians makes their fear of him far more justified (on a group level) than his fear of them.
Nevertheless, he is not truly invincible. Individual whites can and have been harmed by racial reprisal, and the white man’s institutional power has been steadily eroded since the civil rights era, now being considerably weaker than it was before. Still, he rules the better part of the world (in more ways than one), and since the left sees that as fundamentally injust, there is plenty of work to do.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
· Edited 1mo ago
I just think of what’s good for civilization.
Specifically, White civilization. After all, I'm sure that you'd prefer to avoid total Chinese conquest, even if it would advance civilization in the abstract.
Really, the "enlightened spreaders of civilization" framing for global white dominance strikes me as thin cover for the standard ethnocentric motivations, or at least it's trivially reducible to them. Indeed, would it not be better for "civilization" if Somalia were to belong to the white man, so he may remake it in his image? What, then, should a Somali who recognizes this pattern do, to prevent his people going the way of the Amerindian?
"Whether the whites won the land by treaty, by armed conquest, or, as was actually the case, by a mixture of both, mattered comparatively little so long as the land was won. It was all-important that it should be won, for the benefit of civilization and in the interests of mankind. It is indeed a warped, perverse, and silly morality which would forbid a course of conquest that has turned whole continents into the seats of mighty and flourishing civilized nations. [...] it is of incalculable importance that America, Australia, and Siberia should pass out of the hands of their red, black, and yellow aboriginal owners, and become the heritage of the dominant world races."
- Theodore Roosevelt
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
Given that the vast majority of people already get married and that status approximates a zero-sum game, such an intervention would actually work by penalizing the status of unmarried/childless people (women). Of course, that's quite mean and doesn't make for compelling rhetoric, so it gets consistently brushed over in birthrate discussions.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
Women do actually have generally stronger immune responses than men. This paper I found interprets the difference through a evolutionary biology lens: males pursue a higher variance strategy compared to females, prioritizing competitive attributes like size/strength over more conservative survival traits like resistance to infection. Interestingly, there seems to be a concomitant downside: women are also more prone to autoimmune disorders than men.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
· Edited 2mo ago
black woman destroys cultural inheritance of humanity because she's peeved
>”Humanity? That’s the white man’s cultural heritage and no one else’s.”
sjw_hitler_combined_speechbubble.jpg
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
I can easily pass off as 'one of the good ones' so I am not too bothered.
You really should be. No Edict of Expulsion ever included an "except the good ones" clause, and even if it did it's unlikely you'd be treated nearly as well as you are now.
I see this phenomenon in dissident spaces a lot, where non-whites underestimate the threat that HBD/racialism actually poses to them personally. There's this deflection away from taking it too seriously, in the mold of "they don't care where you're from as long as you're racist", but at a certain point, you have to assume that people actually mean what they say. If you don't believe present rhetoric is particularly worrying, you can also extrapolate beyond the current horizon; personally, if Total Chud Victory is to pass, I'd put 40-50% probability on turnabout becoming fair play, in the "Make India Aryan Again" sense.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
· Edited 3mo ago
I agree, but that leads us to the next question: do Muslims deserve to be bullied? That is, is the humiliation/ostracization of Muslims in Western societies an effective means towards generally desirable outcomes? (For the record, I think so, but preferably in a more limited sense.)
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
I strongly wish I had a copy of that meme where some Twitter wag points out that when humanity invented the wheel, we imagined the universe as a wheel, when we invented clocks, the universe became one of clockwork, and when we invented computation, the universe became increasingly interpreted as one of computation.
Found it in video form.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
Men overwhelmingly make the first sexual move (and then make 3-5 moves for every 1 his female partner makes). This roughly 4:1 sexual dance is preferred by the overwhelming majority of men and women.
I think it's moreso a compromise rather than a mutual preference. I feel like most men would ideally want something like a 1:1-2:1 ratio (and with bigger tits) and most women would ideally want something more, ah, romance novel-esque (though only with the most desirable men, of course).
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
Israeli meddling may be its own thing, but I'm skeptical of conspiratorial accusations against the Jewish presence in globohomo/woke/$CURRENT_THING-ism. After all, PMC Whites aren't particularly known for their opposition to woke; I suspect that the overrepresentation of Jews in general wokery is primarily a function of their increased presence in the PMC and not reflective of a distinctly Jewish bent towards leftist progressivsim. If you had data showing jews to be significantly more woke than status-matched whites, that would be more convincing.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
· Edited 3mo ago
You said that "the Torah says it's ok to rape boys under the age of 9". This reads to me like autistic legalist interpretation on precisely how the laws around equal punishment for sexual offenses and minimum age for criminal culpability interact, not an endorsement of pedophilia; it's no more sinister than an Aella poll.
Semi-relatedly, here's a funny bit from Sanhedrin 55a on the halakhaic status of putting your dick in your own ass:
Rav Aḥadevoi bar Ami asked Rav Sheshet: With regard to one who performs the initial stage of homosexual intercourse on himself, what is the halakha? Is he liable for homosexual intercourse? Rav Sheshet said to him: You disgust me with your question; such an act is not possible.
Rav Ashi said: What is your dilemma? With regard to doing so with an erect penis, you cannot find such a case. You can find it only when one performs this act of intercourse with a flaccid penis. And the halakha is subject to a dispute: According to the one who says that a man who engages in intercourse with a flaccid penis, with one of those with whom relations are forbidden, is exempt, as that is not considered intercourse, here too, when one does so to himself, he is exempt. And according to the one who says that he is liable, he is rendered liable here for transgressing two prohibitions according to Rabbi Yishmael; he is rendered liable for engaging in homosexual intercourse actively, and he is rendered liable for engaging in homosexual intercourse passively.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
· Edited 3mo ago
Any value that humanity has above other animals is completely dependent on motherhood, and is therefore subordinate to it.
This, of course, is why garbage men and truck drivers are among the most admired and desirable professions.
If we're the same, but women fail to reach the same heights as men, that has far harsher implications than if we're different, and have different strengths.
The point is that, from a bioessentialist framework, the female role requires little to no particular strength of character. Pregnancy is a completely automatic process, caring for babies may be arduous but is not particularly skilled work, and if you believe the hereditarians, the actual raising of children has little effect on how they turn out. Additionally, none of the above tasks is particularly suited to cooperative effort, stunting the potential for camaraderie; as the saying goes, nine women can't make a baby in one month. Thus, if woman's sole or primary duty is to fulfill the female biological role, she will be naturally baser and ignobler than the men she pairs with, who must cultivate virtue in themselves to become capable protectors and providers.
The question, then, is how much impact has this lack of incentive for virtue had on the evolutionary development (or lack thereof) of the female mind. While I personally believe that ingrained differences in potential for virtue between men and women are relatively minimal, what differences exist are surely exaggerated by restrictive norms surrounding women's options for societal contribution.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
If womanhood is synonymous with femaleness (that is, performing the biological role of the female sex), then woman has no more claim to dignity (that is, the natural sense which leads us to value man over animal and noble over savage) than any other mammal.
Oh no, not a barely-out-of-the-bronze-age pagan!
If you would prefer an abrahamic source:
[…] who has created me a human and not beast, a man and not a woman, an Israelite and not a gentile, circumcised and not uncircumcised, free and not slave.”
- fragment of a prayer, Cairo Geniza
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
Assuming you mean actual William Shockley style "color coded by nature" scientific racism and aren't just smearing around slurs towards anyone who believes in HBD.
As I understand it, William Shockley was his era's equivalent of modern HBD wonks, being consistently polite and sufficiently apologetic with his message. He was probably coarser with his exact phrasings than you could get away with now, but he was still closer to Charles Murray than William Luther Pierce.
Not that it really matters how polite you are, anyways. "[Your race] intrinsically sucks" is never going to be a popular message, and I'm always bemused by people who appear to think that the normalization of HBD isn't RaHoWa-complete.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
· Edited 3mo ago
If we flinch away from the idea, it is because we realize that such norms are incompatible with dignity of womanhood. If woman's sole appropriate domain is the bearing and raising of children, then Schopenhauer and Thales are substantially correct:
Because women in truth exist entirely for the propagation of the race, and their destiny ends here, they live more for the species than for the individual, and in their hearts take the affairs of the species more seriously than those of the individual. This gives to their whole being and character a certain frivolousness, and altogether a certain tendency which is fundamentally different from that of man; and this it is which develops that discord in married life which is so prevalent and almost the normal state.
[...]
It is only the man whose intellect is clouded by his sexual instinct that could give that stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped, and short-legged race the name of the fair sex; for the entire beauty of the sex is based on this instinct. One would be more justified in calling them the unaesthetic sex than the beautiful. Neither for music, nor for poetry, nor for fine art have they any real or true sense and susceptibility, and it is mere mockery on their part, in their desire to please, if they affect any such thing.
- Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women
There are three attributes for which I am grateful to Fortune: that I was born, first, human and not animal; second, man and not woman; and third, Greek and not barbarian.
- Thales
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-think-were-gonna-have-to-kill-this-guy-steven
More options
Context Copy link