This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
If that is so, then all I can say is thank God. I don't recall any sex scenes that I found either interesting, erotic, or anything more than "will they get this over with so we can move on with the plot?" Maybe the one in "Don't Look Now", which did add to the depth of the characters and their relationship. Most of them are just "We need to bump the ratings up because the teen demographic won't watch unless they think there's a chance they'll get to see tits'n'ass".
But I don't care for romance in general, so I realise I'm in a very tiny minority.
EDIT: I wonder if easy and plentiful access to online porn is part of it? When your best chance of seeing female nudity was the blockbuster movie playing this summer, of course that appealed to the teen audience. But if they can get even more explicit stuff at home, as it were, then there's no reason to go to a movie just for the chance of some boobs being flashed. So movies can either go hardcore, which means restricted to a limited audience, or drop the PG-13 stuff and rely instead on the action scenes and CGI for appeal. That also means they can broaden their appeal to a 'family audience' and those who don't want to see Leading Lady's giant spandex-wrapped bosoms shoved in their faces in glorious Technicolor because they're not into ladies, thanks all the same. Leading Man's bountiful chest may be a different matter but even that seems to have gone.
I agree that most sex scenes don't add anything to the movie and tend to be boring, unless you're watching an actual Erotic Thriller like Fatal Attraction. This is most obvious in anything that was made for HBO, where a lot of shows seemingly felt the need to show nudity just to remind you that you couldn't get this stuff on regular TV (Boardwalk Empire being a good example). I watched A Few Good Men the other night and never got the impression that the movie would have been better if we saw Demi Moore's tits. I feel the same way about gratuitous swearing. The best regular TV drama of all time is the original Law & Order (and by regular TV I mean a show that was on an actual TV channel weekly from September to May each year and put out 20–25 episodes a season), and that show had little profanity and no sex. The economics of the film industry are partly to blame; movies tend to get pigeonholed based on their MPAA rating, and the easiest way to bump things up to an R is to add gratuitous profanity and nudity.
I think that was a deliberate strategy by HBO to mark them out as different from the conventional TV stations - "we're like the movies, you can see stuff here that you won't see on mainstream TV".
Not to mention that sex and nudity is always a popular tactic to bring in the punters.
This. If you want to attract an audience, sex is always going to sell. If you are already a big thing, then you come under a lot more scrutiny. (During the last season, there were Guardian editorials calling out GoT for killing black characters.)
Of course, the story of tumblr runs roughly parallel with regard to sex.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
There was also Rome, but I'd unironically argue that the sex scenes were relevant to the plot.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link