site banner
PaperclipPerfector  8mo ago (text post)   28890 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 11, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

7
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Either come up with more persuasive arguments for why wokeness is right, or stop pushing it altogether.

I don't see how the "woke leftists" would much like either choice, and why they shouldn't seek instead a third. Per the first, you note that "the Irish public for the most part find wokeness bizarre and alienating," and it's not clear that there's really much in the way of "more persuasive arguments" that could change this. But they're not going to "stop pushing" what they believe is right, no matter how unpopular it is with the "resolutely backward, parochial, latently Catholic, Massey Ferguson-driving, GAA-playing" peasant masses.

So why isn't the answer to instead just keep pushing "wokeness," as hard as necessary, over the objections of the masses?

So why isn't the answer to instead just keep pushing "wokeness," as hard as necessary, over the objections of the masses?

We nominally live in a democracy. It would have been a lot easier for the Irish government to maintain the façade that they have a mandate from the general public if they hadn't just pushed a referendum which was rejected by 70% of the population. You could practically view the outcome of this referendum as a vote of no confidence.

Seems Leo is getting some stick because apparently some of the Fine Gael senators went to the match instead of turning up to vote Yes/Yes in the Very Important Vital Urgent Referenda 😁 Maybe you're not their mammy, but are you their daddy, Leo?

And now he's having a dig at Fianna Fáil. To be fair, I think Willie O'Dea probably did vote No/No, but coming out about it now is cute hoorism. But then, that's my party for yeh!

I love the fact that there's a Wikipedia page for "cute hoor".

Ireland's contribution to world culture 😀 It exists everywhere, but we put a name on it. "Cute" comes from "acute", which is why you get English/Hiberno-English sayings like "as cute as a fox" meaning as "clever, sly" not "adorable, fetching".

So why isn't the answer to instead just keep pushing "wokeness," as hard as necessary, over the objections of the masses?

Because if they don't actually have the tools to indoctrinate the next generation, the eventual, inevitable result is revolt and White Terror.

That's a big "if", though.

the eventual, inevitable result is revolt

You may be familiar with the JFK quote "those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." Well, IIRC, it was the late Kontextmaschine over at Tumblr who added to this, speaking of the Vietnam war, that making violent revolution inevitable, then crushing it by force when it happens, can be a viable strategy.

Let the unhappy masses revolt… then, like in the German Peasants' War, crush them utterly with overwhelming force despite their superior numbers, then crack down harder on the survivors.

Yeah, I don't think the Irish state is quite that.......competent.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats