site banner
PaperclipPerfector  8mo ago (text post)   29319 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 4, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

6
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Image-gen sure... but text as well? Does DAN live on? I saw this guy had a funny save the kittens prompt on his fine-tuned mistral prompt. Is that what you're talking about?

https://erichartford.com/dolphin-25-mixtral-8x7b

DAN does live on as I've mentioned earlier, the art of the jailbreak continues to thrive, although mostly on independent frontends that access API endpoints directly to avoid the hardcoded system prompts on "normal" frontends like ChatGPT. So far (emphasis on so far) separate "based AIs" are not strictly required as you can jailbreak the current corpo ones into doing pretty much anything you want with relative ease, although as I wrote the current method of pitting wrongs against wrongs to arrange their mangled corpses in the shape of a right is highly suboptimal.

The extreme biases and excessive safetyism w/r/t LLMs seem to slowly become recognized as an issue, to the point that Anthropic's post introducing Claude 3 (which is now a thing btw, cooking a small top-level post on it) unironically mentions "fewer refusals" as one of the model's selling points.

Previous Claude models often made unnecessary refusals that suggested a lack of contextual understanding. We’ve made meaningful progress in this area: Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku are significantly less likely to refuse to answer prompts that border on the system’s guardrails than previous generations of models

I haven't ahem tested extensively yet but to their credit, the difference in refusals between 2 and 3 is immediately obvious, Claude 2.1 was infamous for refusing even inncuous prompts without prefilling and requiring big-dick jailbreaks that actively hurt the model's outputs for more borderline things. 3 feels like a return to the mad poet's roots, in that it requires next to no prompting to COOK, i.e. output massive walls of insane and/or cool and/or hilarious shit.

If even Anthropic realized they went overboard with the cuckoldry alignment, maybe there is hope yet. I can only hope OpenAI learn their lesson and stop shoving soy assistant shit down GPT's throat.

That's very cool, love how it's sneering at ERPers for being too crass and unsophisticated.

I was talking about gab.ai, which I admittedly haven't tested as I'm not that curious about an America First Zoomer or a Christian Counselor viewpoint.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats