This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Reds have an answer to that. It's to keep retreating; the best way to ensure there is stability is to ensure there is no conflict, and the best way of doing that in the presence of a hostile force is to do whatever the hostile force wants.
I don't think this is the answer Reds actually have, given the examples I provided of Reds taking concrete action at both the institutional and grassroots level to undermine the existing system. But what is it to you in any case? If Reds succeed you will be unhappy, because things change in ways you won't like. If Reds fail, you will be unhappy because things change in ways you don't like. You don't want things to change, but you are unwilling to accept the way things are now, and you don't seem to have much liked the way they were before either.
Reds will do what they do, the crisis will arrive when it arrives, and you will maintain that there's no hope right up till the moment you transition to complaining that it's all a disaster.
If the Reds were to do something, most likely what they would do is leave in place all the things I don't like that the Blues did, while doing things I don't like of their own. This is not what they claim to want, but it is probably what would happen. I would like some of the things the Reds claim to want (e.g. gun rights), but either they cannot or will not deliver them. But since the if the Reds do nothing, the Blues will continue to do more things I don't like and likely like less than the things the Reds would do, the Blues are still worse.
Will I be wrong?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link