site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 15, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

13
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I still don't know what is the 'something' you're referring to here

The "something" is:

was on Capitol Grounds but did not enter, but encouraged others to enter

cjet is claiming this is pretty much opposite of what happened, and you said you don't have any evidence to prove otherwise.

so I abstracted the latter factor into a more generalized "whipped up crowd to head towards the Capitol" to broaden the search. Alex Jones came to mind because he was there and I remembered him leading a "1776!" chant with a crowd.

Except you didn't mention that you decided to loosen the criteria in your original post at all, so how can you claim to be surprised we took your post as implying Alex Jones "was on Capitol Grounds but did not enter, but encouraged others to enter" if this is what you yourself claim Epps' conduct boils down to?

but I'm trying to do the work SlowBoy hasn't by proactively looking for individuals to compare Epps against, and I'm more than open to other suggestions.

So why don't you just say "oops, my bad, I didn't mean to imply that", and get back to the topic at hand?

If that's what cjet is indeed referring to then oops, my bad, I didn't mean to imply that and I'm curious how that misinterpretation occurred with what I wrote and what edits I should make to rectify that. I thought "encouraged others to march towards the Capitol but did not enter themselves" was clear enough but I'm open to edit suggestions. I'm also open to other individuals who serve as better comparisons.

If we're allowing for imperfect comparisons, what exactly is the reason to not compare him to Tarrio or others that got got for "seditious conspiracy"?

No reasons at all. Comparisons get less relevant the more distant they are but there's still some insight to be gleaned. Here's Tarrio's sentencing memos filed by prosecutors (includes all other codefendants) and the one filed by Tarrio's attorney.

That's a 100 pages worth of documents, is there anything in particular I should be seeing there?

I haven't reviewed them so I don't know. I tried multiple comparisons that people had various objections to so I'm inviting others to find better ones to contrast against. The sentencing memos tend to be the most helpful one-stop-shop to quickly scan for information so I figured linking to them would be helpful.