This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
All fine and good but what if you think some large institution is systemically violating grandma's rules by building airplanes with too narrow of seats? The rub is when demands are made of others and individuals are crushed by society's immense gears.
This is an indictment of having gears that large. Not of the finite power of courtesy.
Large institutions may be necessary for modern life, but is modern life really instrumental to human flourishing? And insofar as parts of it are, do those parts really require large institutions?
I've long been convinced universities are not just superfluous but actively hampering g the pursuit of knowledge for instance, and those exist precisely at that size that becomes too large to remain personal.
A properly ordered society doesn't have humans as replaceable cogs of a machine that could ultimately run without humans. Either remove humans or remove the machine.
Perhaps true but from the perspective of the progressive it's intolerable that any are oppressed and large gears are the mechanism by which they're able to crush oppressors. You can say they shouldn't but that's a values disagreement.
I am indeed not opposed to nature because I know one opposes it at their peril. Which is of course not something I share with progressives.
That said, the vision of most progressives for the future is rarely that cynical. Most just think that if we turn the knobs of the great machine correctly we'll get Star Trek. There is an unstated faith behind the idea of systemic injustice that a just system can be made.
Unfortunately it is not the case. Every single attempt for now more than 200 years has been frustrated and billions have died on that altar. And yet we now live in a world more unjust and unequal than ever.
To any who still want to try I ask: what makes you think you are any different to all your predecessors who made a worse world in the name of a better one?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link