This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Maybe you don't really understand the doctine of the trinity? It's something that you can't logically explain or understand but you have to believe. I'm not even sure what it could mean to believe something you don't understand.
Any attempts at making it make logical sense have been declared heretical, for example:
I agree with you, it seems like even accepting the basic principles of Abrahamic religion regarding the power of God, Jesus’ existence as a human defies all explanation and any attempt to describe it in terms that make sense to humans are heretical. The point is that it doesn’t make sense, it’s not even like any of the above would make God less omniscient or omnipotent or the rest of it all, it’s almost like a game where you’re banned from rephrasing the question itself. It’s effectively prohibited to TRY to make sense of it.
More options
Context Copy link
I'd like to hope that I understand it, considering that I have multiple degrees in theology and have done research projects applying a Trinitarian lens to a range of issues...
There's a sense in which I would say that I don't understand the Trinity. Like Augustine and the seashell, nobody fully understands it. But I hope that I understand it approximately as well as a human being can.
The third one is docetism, incidentally.
And in your opinion something nobody fully understands is less of a shit test than believing in perpetual virginity?
Sure. The idea that nobody would fully understand the nature of God is not a particularly shocking one - certainly both Jews and Muslims will happily accept that much. You might as well point out that no physicist fully understands their own field of study. We gain more knowledge, we learn, but we never reach total comprehension. That's quite all right?
Incidentally, I mentioned the virgin birth. The perpetual virginity is a different doctrine. As FarNearEverywhere notes, even the Reformers, who were as strongly committed to the virgin birth as anyone, had doubts about the perpetual virginity of Mary, particularly in light of Jesus apparently having siblings.
More options
Context Copy link
Yeah, because even the Reformers had a falling out about the perpetual virginity of Mary; Luther had no problem with it, but he was still in mindset a Catholic. As denominations got more Protestant over time, and with the fears of Mariolatry, they denied her virginity.
Of course, then down the line, this leads to denying the Virgin Birth altogether, because hey how can a modern person of the scientific era believe in pregnancy without sex, and then it's not a big step to "Jesus was Just This Guy, You Know?", but that's their problem, not ours or the Orthodox
See the Athakist to the Theotokos:
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link