Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?
This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.
Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Outlining the story as was passed on to me by a family member, there was a recent case here in Alaska where there was a proposal to create a paved road connecting one of the rural villages to the broader highway system (such as it is). Well, some of the opponents of the proposal looked at the plan for how the road would pass through the village, found the name of the person who owns the property at the proposed endpoint, and then started arguing about 'why is the state proposing to spend millions of dollars to build a road to [name]'s house?'
Is there a name for this sort of argument? I mean, setting aside the whole 'ignoring everyone else who would benefit from the road in favor of focusing on the endpoint,' there's the fact that any proposed road would wind up ending at some person's property*. If not this guy, it would be some other guy… but then they'd just ask 'why is the state proposing to spend millions of dollars to build a road to [other guy's name]'s house?' instead. It's a sort of fully-generalizable argument disguised as a specific criticism.
*Unless you spend money building a segment out past where anybody lives into empty wilderness; in which case the opponents would instead be (rightly) asking why you're wasting money on a stretch of pavement that nobody is likely to ever much use.
Isn't this just a case of straw-manning?
They're oversimplifying the proposal that it's a road to a person's house and then arguing over the straw man they set up.
Also, it's possible that the road doesn't end up at someone's house, it could end up at a publicly owned location, or a private factory, or a business. In the case it goes into empty wilderness, there would probably some justification such as developing something there in the future. I think it's a valid question to ask why something is being done, the issue with your example is that the question is straw-manning the proposal by framing it in an uncharitable manner which allows the opponents to ignore other benefits.
I feel like another example might be better to get to the heart of your question about the specific type of argument you're looking to identify.
More options
Context Copy link
Framing? Rhetoric?
More options
Context Copy link
Weakmanning?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link