site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1yr ago (text post)   28224 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 23, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

6
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not only did they do nothing, not only was it some orgs; subversive anti-white ideology has always been highly disproportionality Jewish.

The pushback to it was also highly disproportionally Jewish. It doesn't take an Ashkenazi IQ to see the more than passing resemblance of the privilege discourse in 2010's America to the privilege discourse in 1930's Europe, and a lot of them pointed it out early on, so I don't really care about the disproportional support.

What I do care about is that some of the very specific Jewish people that were on board for each and every step of this crazy ride, are suddenly aghast now that they're on the receiving end of it. You can easily find people who's complaint is literally "we were there for BLM, we were there for MeToo, we were there for trans people, but no one is there for us!". The ones with comparatively less self respect even append a "and we will still support these progressive causes" at the end of that. Then there are outright slimeballs like Ethan Klein (of the linked-by-OP video) who rode the Anti-SJW wave high when that was the top trend, backstabbed people like Jordan Peterson and became buddy-buddy with Hasan Piker when he thought there's more hay to be made on the other side, and is now crying about the support for Hamas in his discord. I was already biting my tongue around TERFs that went full surprised Picachu when they were told they have to wax feminine balls, I don't know how much of that I can do anymore.

I actually kind of hope all these theories about Jewish influence over everything around us are true, so they can find their balls and end this madness, because if they don't, I'll leave you with this: given where we started 10 years ago, and where we are now, how do you think there world is going to look like 10 years from now?

I actually kind of hope all these theories about Jewish influence over everything around us are true, so they can find their balls and end this madness, because if they don't, I'll leave you with this: given where we started 10 years ago, and where we are now, how do you think there world is going to look like 10 years from now?

Well, that would be the greatest blackpill, wouldn't it? That there is no one who can save us, no one in control of the machine. There were people who could control it, and/or thought they could control it, but they've failed (assuming they ever actually could), or are just gone now.

I think a bunch of sci-fi horror video games use this kind of trope.

There are people in control or at least having a lot of influence over people, but they don't understand the forces that they are playing with and think that they can just stir up anti-white hatred, but set limits where people are not supposed to notice that the arguments for anti-white hatred are even more applicable to Jews.

The pushback to it was also highly disproportionally Jewish. It doesn't take an Ashkenazi IQ to see the more than passing resemblance of the privilege discourse in 2010's America to the privilege discourse in 1930's Europe, and a lot of them pointed it out early on, so I don't really care about the disproportional support.

Has it? IMHO it's been token Jewish. And what Jewish resistance to the remaking of my country exists, it's dwarfed by the power of the ADL to dictate narrative, policy, and get people removed. Even now the ADL is running cover, pretending this enormous groundswell of anti-Semitism is from "far right white nationalist", despite the obvious falsehood of it being evident from watching literally any video. They are too deeply invested in labelling any anti-immigration organization a hate group.

The ADL being Quislings (Czerniakóws?) is a bad thing, but if you make enemies of an entire demographic due to the bad acts of one particularly high-profile activist organization being suicidally leftist, you're going to run out of demographic groups real quick.

Who said anything about making enemies? More like leaving them to the consequences of their own actions. I'm staying out of it.

Has it? IMHO it's been token Jewish. And what Jewish resistance to the remaking of my country exists, it's dwarfed by the power of the ADL to dictate narrative, policy, and get people removed.

Sure. One side is winning, and the other is losing. There's a disproportionate number of Jewish people on both sides.

Even now the ADL is running cover, pretending this enormous groundswell of anti-Semitism is from "far right white nationalist", despite the obvious falsehood of it being evident from watching literally any video.

Yeah, and feminists insist the transgender movement is a men's rights movement despite the obvious falsehood of that idea. It would still be factually wrong to lay the blame for it on women as a whole, or even on average.

The pushback to it was also highly disproportionally Jewish.

How much of it is the Jewish idpol card kinda sticking you in a state of quasi-whiteness that allows rallying back against intersectionalism without getting immediately cancelled yourself, though?

I have no idea who the non-Harvey-related Weinstein brothers are, but I'd have pointed out Curtis Yarvin. Not only did he still get cancelled, but when "he's a monarchist" tried to get through his cancelers' brains and ended up as "DOES NOT COMPUTE" (with which I admit I sympathize), they fell right back on "he must be a Nazi!" without noticing the irony (which was ... less sympathetic).

Scott Alexander got doxxed by the New York Times for being part of the pushback. The article naming him seemed most concerned by the idea that biological differences might have something to do with intelligence, and I do see how that frightens normal people who are scrupulously concerned about the bad inferences one might too-easily make from such a belief, but now that we've discovered the Times hires people who they know have a history of literally praising Hitler to do primary-source reporting on Israel I'm less inclined to give them a pass as "normal" or "scrupulous".

I have no idea who the non-Harvey-related Weinstein brothers are

I think it's a reference to Bret and Eric Weinstein (pronounced "Wine-Stine," in contrast to Harvey's "Wine-steen"). Eric has been a public intellectual for a while, whereas Bret came into prominence as a biology professor at Evergreen college some ago, where he pushed back against the college's annual "Day of Absence" which requested that white people remain off-campus for the day. IIRC, part of Bret's argument mentioned how his Jewish heritage made him more sensitive to policies where people are asked to not be present purely on the basis of their ethnicity or race. This led to some viral videos of him being confronted by angry students, eventually leading to him and his wife (another biology professor at Evergreen) resigning. They went on a bunch of podcasts afterward, and I believe they started their own podcast, becoming public intellectuals like Eric.

Didn't seem to help the Weinstein brothers (no relation to Harvey) to not get immediately cancelled.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats