This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Which is something I've never quite been comfortable with.
It's easy for me to say rounding up all the, I don't know, Americans would count as ethnic cleansing. Nationality is an obvious cultural cluster in a way which English-speaking...isn't? At least not within America. I can see how that would be different in other countries, especially ones with very different colonial histories, but it's not intuitive in the same way that racial or religious or national clusters form an ethnicity.
Perks of being a lingua franca, I suppose.
If the US decided to remove all Hispanics from the US, that wouldn't be called ethnic cleansing? I don't see how nationality can be culturally more important than language. Language is the single most important aspect of your culture. You speak your language every day, whereas you don't often think about what country you live in. People tend to have more affinity towards foreigners who speak their language than people in their own country who speak a different language. That's why separatism almost always happens on lingustic lines. Quebec even calls itself a separate "nation" within Canada.
More options
Context Copy link
It feels more intuitive if your country has a history of persecuting regional patois to create such lingua franca.
When you're rounding up children, sending them to specific schools and beating them if they speak a language, it starts to look a lot more similar to other forms of ethnic persecution.
Of course this isn't what's happening here, but I just want to assert that using language to draw ethnic boundary isn't bizarre. It's a very common group signifier along with religion.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link