naraburns nihil supernum
1yr ago
(text post)
29463 thread views
Israel-Gaza Megathread #1
This is a megathread for any posts on the conflict between (so far, and so far as I know) Hamas and the Israeli government, as well as related geopolitics. Culture War thread rules apply.
But the moral burden question is going to depend purely on how effective the Gazans are at broadcasting images to the outside world.
I'm just some asshole in America who has never even been to the region, so I'm not assessing credibility. But reports online have it that hospitals are running out of generators/fuel, that at this point "triage" is taking the form of deprioritizing limbs crushed by falling buildings and only treating life threatening injuries.
Which should still be blamed on Hamas, but the images will be powerful. The human suffering that will be inflicted on the people of Gaza is going to take a lot of stomach to justify for people who don't hate Arabs on a visceral pre-existing level. It's highly likely that different media bubbles (Arab vs American news; Twitter vs Telegram; Red vs Blue tribe at some level) will give different answers.
Right, the imagery available will impact how people think about it, regardless of the underlying moral logic. Personally, I find saying, "they prioritize keeping hostages over treating their own people" as an accurate and revelatory framing of the situation, but quite a few people make it no further than "people not being treated is bad".
Or they'll make it all the way to "Killing 10,000 or maiming 300,000 to save 1,000 is unjust; punishing civilians for not overthrowing their evil government is unjust" as a just and revelatory framing for their worldview.
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The move is smart, and I'm not sure it's wrong.
But the moral burden question is going to depend purely on how effective the Gazans are at broadcasting images to the outside world.
I'm just some asshole in America who has never even been to the region, so I'm not assessing credibility. But reports online have it that hospitals are running out of generators/fuel, that at this point "triage" is taking the form of deprioritizing limbs crushed by falling buildings and only treating life threatening injuries.
Which should still be blamed on Hamas, but the images will be powerful. The human suffering that will be inflicted on the people of Gaza is going to take a lot of stomach to justify for people who don't hate Arabs on a visceral pre-existing level. It's highly likely that different media bubbles (Arab vs American news; Twitter vs Telegram; Red vs Blue tribe at some level) will give different answers.
Right, the imagery available will impact how people think about it, regardless of the underlying moral logic. Personally, I find saying, "they prioritize keeping hostages over treating their own people" as an accurate and revelatory framing of the situation, but quite a few people make it no further than "people not being treated is bad".
Or they'll make it all the way to "Killing 10,000 or maiming 300,000 to save 1,000 is unjust; punishing civilians for not overthrowing their evil government is unjust" as a just and revelatory framing for their worldview.
This is not a morally clear and simple situation.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link