naraburns nihil supernum
1yr ago
(text post)
29363 thread views
Israel-Gaza Megathread #1
This is a megathread for any posts on the conflict between (so far, and so far as I know) Hamas and the Israeli government, as well as related geopolitics. Culture War thread rules apply.
But my baseline assumption is that if you're willing to break all the limbs of an innocent woman and parade her corpse through the street in her underwear, you're probably not drawing the line at rape.
Skimming that source, it is ridiculous and not reliable at all. In addition to being shady and biased it's also clearly trying to lie. It does not mostly say what you or its own headline claims to say.
You are also probably lying since an intelligent and honest person should know better and be aware of how disingenuous they are being.
Amadan
You are capable of doing better, more often, and I wish you would.
SoonToBeBanned 1yr ago
You are also probably lying since an intelligent and honest person should know better and be aware of how disingenuous they are being.
Adding the word "probably" is not enough justification to call someone a liar because they believe something you don't. It's fine to criticize the source and argue that it's not credible, but don't call people liars because they cite sources you find non-credible.
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
There's been some reports from survivors of women being raped. How reliable is an anonymous eyewitness account? Who knows.
But my baseline assumption is that if you're willing to break all the limbs of an innocent woman and parade her corpse through the street in her underwear, you're probably not drawing the line at rape.
Skimming that source, it is ridiculous and not reliable at all. In addition to being shady and biased it's also clearly trying to lie. It does not mostly say what you or its own headline claims to say.
You are also probably lying since an intelligent and honest person should know better and be aware of how disingenuous they are being.
In other words, not at all, obviously.
Adding the word "probably" is not enough justification to call someone a liar because they believe something you don't. It's fine to criticize the source and argue that it's not credible, but don't call people liars because they cite sources you find non-credible.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link