This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I disagree that this is solely about that. I think it is also a necessary part of the House exercising its oversight powers on the DOJ. We have several whistleblowers who have produced clear and convincing evidence that the DOJ attempted to cover up Hunter Biden's tax fraud, ignore his multiple weapons felonies (even their softball agreement that temporarily was about to be in effect only discussed one charge of many available to them), ignore at least 3 unique, but possibly almost a dozen unique (as in different entities) FARA violations, and cover up other possibly criminal conduct, it is no reach to think they are suppressing evidence that connects Joe to those or other related crimes. Plus we already know they double standard-ed the heck out of the documents case WRT Joe.
An impeachment inquiry should, ostensibly, give them jurisdiction for all those documents, and the ability to call all those witnesses. Which they very much need to do for non-political purposes. Do I think it was a tactical error in opening it into President Biden as opposed to AG Garland? I do think so. But it might be a necessary in-caucus compromise with some of the hardliners. Also it does avoid the very serious prospect of Garland just resigning and blowing up that inquiry.
That's the one that really should be hurting the Party of Gun Control To Stop These Senseless Massacres, not "well did he mean Joe by 'big guy'?" parsing.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link