Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 166
- 3
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I managed to make it through Yellowjackets season 1, thanks to it being a series I could watch with a ladyfriend. I made it about 1 episode into season 2 before I lost complete interest.
Wheel of Time season 2 seems to land better for me than season 1, but maybe that's because all of the outrage has mostly blown over. I was a book enjoyer of this series decades ago and was upset at the tv adaption for many of the same reasons that you've outlined. After enough time to forget my frustrations at season 1, I'm casually watching it again. They really double down on the girl power/strong women stuff andRand's power use seems to be really one dimensional compared to Aes Sedai power use Hard to say whether the series will die or not at this stage.
Foundation is also something I'm watching, but with related issues. Strong (largely unlikable) women of colour are the main protagonists (except of course for Harry Seldon; arrogant old white man). The antagonist evil emperors are of course also white men. The best warrior general in the galaxy (who will inevitably turn good rebel) is gay. One of the other straight male heroes is strangely attracted to a plump homely woman with short hair who talks down to him. Now that I think about it, the vast majority of relationships in this series are interracial. The series only vaguely holds to the premise of the books at all.
I'm resigned to tv shows and movies basically not being made for people like me as time moves on. If the culture continues lurching in this direction, I eventually won't be able to enjoy anything new and will have to sate myself with a back catalogue of archeomedia. If I'm lucky AI generated content will come to the rescue before that happens, but there's no guarantees.
Which Foundation stories are adapted? What's the plot?
If they wanted Strong Female or Male Of Color, doesn't the Mule story center around a female? Bayta something? And isnt Hober Mallow (maybe I got the name wrong, I mean the Trader protagonist) some kind of colored? There's already diversity! And do they really portray Hari Seldon as arrogant? Jesus.
The series is very loosely based around the premise of the first few books. Basically, the establishment of the Foundation due to the development of Psychohistory and the weathering of crises. The second season has strong foreshadowing of The Mule and is also currently establishing the setup of the Second Foundation of mentalists.
I only read the first few books in the series, but apparentlya main character which is a robot guiding the Empire's destruction is a character in one of the later books.
To be fair it's difficult to adapt a book series like Foundation that is largely comprised of vignettes with a rotating cast of characters to a TV series which has the audience expectation of a consistent cast that they can emotionally engage with. That said, many of the 1950's cultural themes and values have clearly been stripped out and replaced by current year identity politics.
Thanks, I might grit my teeth and check it out.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link