This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I wouldn’t mind hearing more about that compatibility.
Trump has a couple standout policies (especially regarding the border) that don’t seem to fit. His foreign policy was a mixed bag. Everything else on his platform is non-unique, and basically just imports the RNC planks. Paternalistic on social issues, libertarian on regulatory issues.
But you don’t need Trump to do that. I think a block of wood could do an equivalent job, so long as you nailed a list of Federalist Society judges to it. It’d probably spend less money on golf, too.
There are three main aspects to every successful enterprises: production, logistics, and marketing. Trump is the loudest marketer of Republican policies and paleo-libertarian and republican ideals since Reagan and Limbaugh; his great accomplishment has been awakening the Republicans, conservatives, blue-dog Democrats, independents, class-conscious freedom-conscious liberals, and right-libertarians to the depth of the deep state and the breadth of its control.
The Republican Party has marketed itself to its voter base as “We’ve got clear perceptions of the world and the best policies. Vote us into power and we’ll fix everything.” But at the top levels of state and national politics, they’re all centrist blue tribers who read WaPo and watch CNN, and get their ideas of Republicanism from The Atlantic.
The Libertarian Party is a perpetual joke except when the progressives need a spoiler against the conservatives. Online, the anarchists have taken over from the lassaiz-faire advocates.
Trumpism as a movement is about trying to reinstall the republic as the power center of America, the constitution instead of the cathedral. His speeches and his foreign policy are about America as the last bastion of freedom from tyrannical governance, and tyrannical governments react to him and his as if this is true.
He succeeded at tax cuts toward the Laffer Curve until 2025, keeping America out of new wars during his term, and a historic shift in Supreme Court judgeships including keeping Merrick Garland out of office. He also exposed the suspicious voting irregularities and surprisingly legal election strategies which resulted in more votes being counted for Biden. He made it clear just how big the fight against communism-in-all-but-name is.
He’s done more publicly for marketing the cause of liberty (the purpose of America) through memes than most people with power over policy. That’s why I voted for him the second time.
He also perfectly embodies self-interest as a virtue, something libertarians have gotten away from since Ayn Rand. I trust him to work for his own best interests far more than any public-minded politicians, which is the primary reason I voted for him the first time.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link