site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1yr ago (text post)   29463 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of August 7, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

9
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I empathize a lot with this comment. I did not go through a drastic life change like you did. I was just always a skinny guy whatever I ate ... until I turned about 22.

I started gaining weight slowly. An additional 10 to 15 pounds a year, but I went from skinny to pushing the obese BMI weight category in 5 years. And then suddenly I started losing a bunch of weight. I thought it was great until I visited a doctor ... my liver was getting destroyed by sugar. I had type II diabetes and I wasn't even 30.

Its been a few years. I've managed to get my blood sugar levels in line. I completely quit sugar, started intermittent fasting, and I'm on metformin which gives me explosive diarrhea anytime I fail myself and eat too much sugar (and no, the punishment of explosive diarrhea was not enough to really stop me from eating sugar).

I think quitting sugar has easily been the most difficult thing I have ever done in my life. Not that I've racked up a whole bunch of difficult life experiences. But quitting sugar is always gonna be on that list of metrics.

I had a lifetime of good diet and exercise habits, until I didn't.

I had a lifetime of bad diet and mediocre exercise habits. And it took 25 years before I paid the price. In an alternate world where obesity related problems aren't treated as a medical issue, I'd be fucked. The battery of blood tests that diagnosed the diabetes and liver problems wouldn't have existed in that alternate world. I would have just blissfully kept eating sugar for a few more years before organ failure and possibly death.

I'm glad you seem to be doing better. I'm glad there is another tool in toolbox for dealing with obesity.

Holy balls. You might want to talk to your doctor about MODY - maturity-onset diabetes of the young. Is there a strong family history of diabetes? 28 is very young to wind up with diabetes, poor dietary habits or no. I've seen it, at 25...but that person had a BMI of 70.

My dad has diabetes, but he was diagnosed with it in his old age, after me actually.

My A1C is under control these days. But yes it is strange how early it happened, the doctor was very confused.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats