site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of August 7, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

9
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

especially Indian mothers, having straight hair, blue eyes, and fair skin, is considered a huge plus

I am from this culture, as is my whole family. I have never heard of straight hair being a particular influence on anyone's desires. Non-brown eyes as well are extremely extremely rare (my aunt has green eyes, other than that I can probably count on my hands the number of people I've seen with them back home) and even when people give a damn about it it's mostly for women rather than men.

Same with fair skin. Fair skin is a massive plus yes, but again more so for women than men and also it's only a plus because fair skin is associated with being higher caste (not universally true but that's the association). However this only extends to the point where the fair skin makes you mimic a high caste, being albino gets you no benefits at all. Same with being whiter than a Mediterranean, at that point your skin is so pale that it's very clear you're an outsider who's not even part of the caste system, and that gets you back down to bringing no beneifts. An Italian could benefit from "fair skin", a Nordic will not.

One of my earliest memories is my mother telling me (when I was around 3) that when I grow up I will marry an educated, intelligent girl who is a Muslim. She told me that if the girl was not Muslim but really loved me, she would convert, and if she didn't that was a sign it wasn't true love. (the Muslim bit is a stand in for similar cultural values, plenty of Muslims have different cultural values to me and would not make a good fit, my parents would also not be happy if I got a Muslim girl from a family that drank alcohol).

For a long time I was poisoned by western propaganda and scoffed at this, why did it matter whether she converted to Islam or I converted to her religion? For after all love is love and the situation is symmetric. I even went so far as to hurt my mother by saying that it wasn't a given that my children would be Muslim (this is one of the big regrets I have). However now that I have grown up and become wiser I have realized the value of what she spoke of, and now not only will I not marry a non-Muslim woman but if she converts I will rightfully place more conditions on her expected behavior compared to a woman who was born Muslim (no different to how banks charge more interest on loans from poor people compared to rich people). After having a good heart, cultural and values fit is the most important thing needed for a successful marriage (even more so than similar intelligence levels).