site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of July 31, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

12
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I want a universe that feels reasoanbly alive, with characters who are interesting and not just inserted for politics reasons. … [How do I insert believable trans people subtly]?

The problem is of course that the moment you put those two sentences together it becomes a statement that would only be made by a small group of people in a small group of countries post 2016. In short, it is an explicitly political statement about the way you see the world that will realistically affect the opinions of at least a few people on a contentious subject and therefore your game becomes prime culture war fodder. Personally I am sick to death of hearing about trans issues and if I notice a game bringing it up in literally any manner I will react negatively.

I would say:

  1. If you want to make a political statement, decide what it is.

  2. The presence of something unusual is, even today, usually more of a statement than its absence.

  3. If you aren’t going for mass appeal your job becomes a lot easier. Both because your niche audience ultimately cares more about getting good niche content than about the political statements in it, and because you can target more effectively.

Personally I am sick to death of hearing about trans issues and if I notice a game bringing it up in literally any manner I will react negatively.

Isn't this unfair to the game's creator? I can understand being tired of hamfisted political insertions, but there are surely scenarios where a trans character's identity can serve the story.

Imagine a space game where the terrifying Xenos, believing themselves to be benevolent uplifters and not understanding the concept of human individuality, begin abducting and converting humans en-masse into biological-machine hybrids.

Maybe you capture a group of these mecha-humans and interrogate them, one of whom used to be trans. I could see that providing interesting narrative insight.

I want to play that same game without the trans bit. I don’t remember encountering any trans characters prior to 2015 and nothing was lost thereby.

As per my above post, you cannot ignore the context here. The trans movement is real, it is insane (in my opinion), it is incredibly damaging to society and to the poor individuals who get caught up in it (in my opinion). I would like the trans movement to be starved of attention while the core of people with serious gender dysphoria are given the psychiatric help they need. In the meantime, it doesn’t matter how hamfisted or subtle your propaganda is, it’s propaganda and I refuse to give it my eyeballs or my money.

It’s worth noting that artistic merit used to be considered an aggravating factor in obscenity trials because interesting, engaging propaganda for a bad cause is much more dangerous than hamfisted, irritating propaganda.