Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 207
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I've got an RPG itch. Is Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous an enjoyable experience for someone who is tired of wokeism/feminism? I heard they gave basically every good/strong role in the game to female characters(?).
If the game is good, why do you care if the badasses are women? You can always make multiple characters if you really want to have a sausage party.
Anyway, I haven’t played WotR. Kingmaker was fun enough, but I got tired in the third act or so. Didn’t find it very political.
There’s Tyranny, which avoids giving all the good roles to women, mostly because all the roles are horrible, awful people. Except for Daddy Tunon. But that game is way more political than Pathfinder.
Have you played some of the turn based RPGs like Underrail?
I'm picky when it comes to games. I care a lot about story, characters, writing. If the developers make the game a vehicle for implementing their sexism and sneering at anyone who seethes at it, that bothers me. It also brings up associated frustrations, like thoughts about how, if it were a game where the males were all awesome smart leader types and the females useless morons, there would be a lot more uproar. I don't like seeing people get away with things they should be stopped from doing.
But I'm not saying Pathfinder WotR is getting away with anything categorically bad, I don't know, I just heard a rumor in that direction.
Well said.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Some people care enough about a quality story that an annoying or boring story will put them off a mechanically fun game. It's never really come up for me, but I understand the idea in principle.
I understand how that could be the case.
I want to know what level of stealing the “good/strong roles” it takes to trigger that. Normally, when I see a game with a wildly female cast, it suggests a fanservice effect…
I've seen a lot of memes lately complaining about female characters in recent video games who are seemingly deliberately designed to have physically unattractive faces. So lots of female characters isn't necessarily indicative of fanservice.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link