This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I think some of them were scripted, because such sites (organised or just a bunch of people like here) offer advice along the lines of "if you want to get X, then this is the line you have to give them".
The same way I see advice online about "if you're going to write in protest to your congresscritter, do it this way because otherwise it will be ignored".
So yeah, it doesn't seem out of bounds that clinics would get a lot of young patients reciting the same "I first knew when I was two, I didn't want to do this, or wear that, and my parents felt that I wasn't what I was assigned at birth and I have suicidal feelings about being forced to be this gender which I am not and I have body dysmorphia" narrative, because they've read "this is what you have to say in order to get the doctors to agree".
I absolutely agree with scripting. I’ve seen it somewhat in people seeking diagnosis of adhd as well. It seems like people sort of learn what kinds of statements are likely to get you the treatment you want (in adhd, it’s Ritalin, and quite often the IR form over the XR form). The issue is serious in psychiatry as too many don’t really question what they’re told, and therefore it’s fairly easy to game the system.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link